greenhouse gas emissions – GHG Accounting

Ontario’s cap-and-trade program design options released for further consultation

In the lead-up to Paris climate talks (COP 21), the Ontario government has released a consultation paper that sets out the early details of how Ontario’s proposed cap-and-trade program will work. The proposed program details are not final and are subject to further consultation before a final cap-and-trade regulation is expected to be issued in spring 2016.

Ontario’s proposed cap-and-trade system would commence on January 1, 2017 and the cap on greenhouse gas emissions would decline by 3.7% in each of the following three years, falling to 15% below 1990 levels by 2020. It is anticipated that the cap-and-trade program will have a broad reach and most sectors of the economy will fall under the cap including heavy industry, transportation fuel (including gasoline and natural gas), and electricity generation.

Since the transportation sector accounts for a significant portion of the province’s overall emissions, a carbon price on transportation fuels will seek to incentivize drivers to choose alternative means of transportation. The Canadian Fuels Association has estimated that if Ontario’s carbon allowances trade at the same minimum price as those under Quebec’s cap-and-trade system, the cost of gasoline will initially increase by at least 3.6 cents per litre, rising to 4.6 cents by 2020.

In order to provide some relief to certain trade-exposed sectors, the Ontario government has proposed allocating free allowances to certain industries, in some cases up to 100% for the first four years of the program. Under the cap-and-trade program, these industries will still be required to reduce emissions in order to comply with their obligations under the cap, but their compliance costs would be lower.

Consultations with industry and other stakeholders is ongoing, and as noted above, it is anticipated that the details of the cap-and-trade program will be finalized in spring 2016. As we reported earlier, Ontario has proposed changes to the provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Regulation, which will help to facilitate the linking of Ontario’s cap-and-trade program with the Quebec and California programs.

Ontario Releases Regulatory Proposal to Amend GHG Reporting Regulation

In support of the development and future implementation of its cap-and-trade system, Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) is proposing amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Regulation (O. Reg. 452/09) (the GHG Reporting Regulation). Under the current GHG Reporting Regulation, regulated facilities emitting 25,000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year are required to report and verify their emissions. Once implemented, the proposed amendments will significantly increase the amount of emissions reported and the number of facilities reporting under the GHG Reporting Regulation.
The proposed amendments include the following:
• lowering the reporting threshold to 10,000 tonnes CO2e from the current threshold of 25,000 tonnes per year, while maintaining the requirement to have emissions greater than 25,000 tonnes per year third party verified;
• dividing the emission sources into those that are reporting only and those that require third party verification;
• adding petroleum product suppliers and natural gas distributors to the GHG Reporting Regulation starting in 2016; and
• adding other sources to the reporting regulation including:
– equipment used for natural gas transmission, distribution and storage,
– electricity imports,
– electricity transmission and distribution,
– magnesium production, and
– mobile equipment at facilities.
Similar to California, there will be no emissions thresholds for electricity importers, the purpose of which is to prevent them from sub-dividing into smaller entities to avoid compliance obligations.
The reporting threshold for liquid petroleum fuel distributors and suppliers will be set at 200 litres of fuel to ensure consistency with Québec requirements. The verification threshold will remain at 25,000 tonnes of CO2e, but any liquid fuel distributor and suppliers that exceed the 200 litre threshold will be required to verify their emissions reports. All electricity importers will be required to verify their emissions reports.
The amended GHG Reporting Regulation will also categorize certain emission sources as being subject to reporting requirements only, meaning that these emission will need to be reported, but would not be subject to verification or potential compliance requirements under the cap-and-trade program. These proposed categories include:
• fugitive geothermal units and hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) emissions from cooling units at electricity generators;
• coal storage emissions;
• biomass combustion emissions; and
• on-site emissions from mobile equipment.
The proposed amendments have been posted for a 45 day public review and the comment period will end on October 29, 2015. Comments may be submitted to the MOECC’s designated contact person or online.

Ontario Resurrects Cap-and-Trade

Following recent public consultations on its Climate Change Discussion Paper, Ontario is expected to bring in a cap-and-trade system which reports say could raise between $1 billion to $2 billion per year, depending on the price of carbon permits. Ontario Environment Minister Glen Murray is expected to present the plan to cabinet for approval by mid-April 2015. Under a cap-and-trade system, a limit is placed on total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions with the price of carbon being determined by the market. Under the system envisioned by Ontario, the cap will be divided into permits, some of which will be given away (to maintain competitiveness, particularly where a particular industry is trade sensitive) while the remaining permits will be auctioned off. Regulated emitters will be required to obtain a sufficient number of permits to cover their emissions and where emitters are able to reduce emissions, they will be able to sell permits to those emitters who need more. The auction proceeds will likely be directed into GHG emission reduction initiatives such as energy conservation retrofitting.

Once implemented, Ontario’s system could be linked with Quebec and California’s current cap-and-trade program, which would create a carbon market of 61 million people that covers more than 60% of Canada’s population. Ontario’s cap-and-trade plan has been waiting in the wings for a while. The province agreed to price carbon when it joined the Western Climate Initiative with Quebec, B.C. and California in 2008, and subsequently the Ontario government passed enabling legislation for a cap-and-trade system. However, cap-and-trade soon took a back seat to the recession and political uncertainty meant that there was little appetite for moving forward with climate change plans. With Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne taking a climate leadership role, there is new impetus for bold action on GHG reduction initiatives at the provincial level.

Latest IPCC Report Concludes that the World is Not Well Prepared for Meeting the Climate Change Challenge

Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued its contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report on March 31, 2014. The second of three “Summaries for Policymakers” (the first report from Working Group I on the physical science of climate change was issued in September 2013) addresses climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, and says the effects of climate change are already occurring on all continents and across the oceans. The IPCC report explains that in many cases, the world is ill-prepared to deal with climate change risks and concludes that while there are opportunities to respond to such risks, these risks will be difficult to manage with high levels of warming.

The report, entitled Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, is designed to guide global lawmakers as they devise policies to reduce emissions and make their infrastructure, agriculture and people more resilient to a changing climate. The report details the impacts of climate change to date, the future risks from a changing climate, and the opportunities for effective action to reduce risks. A total of 309 coordinating lead authors, lead authors, and review editors, drawn from 70 countries, were selected to produce the report. They enlisted the help of 436 contributing authors, and a total of 1,729 expert and government reviewers.

Observed impacts of climate change have already affected agriculture, human health, water supplies, ecosystems on land and in the oceans. One of the striking things is that observed impacts are occurring from the tropics to the poles, from small islands to large continents, and from the wealthiest countries to the poorest. The researchers documented how climate change affects everything from retreating glaciers in East Africa, the Alps, the Rockies and the Andes to the bleaching of corals in the Caribbean Sea and Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Mussel-beds and migratory patterns for salmon are changing off the west coast of North America, grapes are maturing faster in Australasia and birds are flying to Europe earlier in the year. One of the IPCC’s starkest findings relates to water availability and food production. Where there was less certainty seven years ago about the potential damage to staple crops, the latest IPCC report found that global wheat and maize production are already being negatively impacted by warmer temperatures, with yields of wheat declining by about 2% per decade and those of maize by 1%. While he report does mention some positive impacts of climate change such as improved crop yields in southeastern South America, it also refers to “future risks and more limited potential benefits”.

Chris Field, co-chair of Working Group II, said the rising trajectory of greenhouse emissions is projected to lead to more than 3 degrees Celsius of additional warming this century. This is on top of the 0.85 degrees of warming already observed since 1880. UN treaty negotiators are aiming to limit the total rise to 2 degrees Celsius. The researchers wrote that economic losses accelerate with greater levels of warming, noting that little analysis has been done for levels of warming of 3 degrees Celsius beyond present temperatures. The report warns that this amount of additional warming would lead to “extensive biodiversity loss”.

The report concludes that responding to climate change involves making choices about risks in a changing world. The nature of the risks of climate change is increasingly clear, though climate change will also continue to produce surprises. It finds that risk from a changing climate comes from vulnerability (lack of preparedness) and exposure (people or assets in harm’s way) overlapping with hazards (triggering climate events or trends). Each of these three components can be a target for smart actions to decrease risk. In particular, adaptation can play a key role in decreasing these risks.

Field also said that: “Understanding that climate change is a challenge in managing risk opens a wide range of opportunities for integrating adaptation with economic and social development and with initiatives to limit future warming. We definitely face challenges, but understanding those challenges and tackling them creatively can make climate-change adaptation an important way to help build a more vibrant world in the near-term and beyond.”

Now the ball is in the policymakers’ court as industry and the public look to their governments to take decisive action and facilitate the implementation of creative solutions to meet the climate change challenge.

The third report from Working Group III (WGIII) of the IPCC will address climate change mitigation and is expected to be released in April 2014.

President Obama Announces Climate Action Plan

On June 25, 2013, President Obama made a long-awaited announcement for his administration’s Climate Action Plan. The plan outlines a range of actions the Obama administration will take using existing authorities to reduce carbon pollution, increase energy efficiency, expand renewable and other low-carbon energy sources, and strengthen resilience to extreme weather and other climate impacts. As part of the plan, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been directed to set standards by June 2015 to reduce carbon pollution from existing power plants.

President Obama’s Climate Action Plan focuses on the following key areas:

· Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions – In lieu of any action by US Congress on setting an economy-wide price on carbon, President Obama is using his powers under the Clean Air Act to curb emissions from power plants, by far the largest unregulated source of US carbon emissions. Companies are seeking regulatory certainty so many of them are prepared to work with the Obama administration on pragmatic approaches to cut GHG emissions and mitigate climate risks. The Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases. Carbon pollution standards for new power plants proposed by EPA in March 2012 have not yet been finalized. In his June 25 speech, President Obama announced a Presidential Memorandum directing the EPA “to work expeditiously to complete carbon pollution standards for both new and existing power plants.”

· Energy Efficiency – The Department of Energy has been directed to build on efficiency standards for dishwashers, refrigerators, and other products that were set during President Obama’s first term. President Obama set a goal of cumulatively reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 3 billion metric tons by 2030 through efficiency measures adopted in his first and second terms. The president also committed to build on heavy-duty vehicle fuel efficiency standards set during his first term with new standards past the 2018 model year.

· Renewable Energy – In 2012, renewable energy was responsible for 12.7% of net U.S. electricity generation with hydroelectric generation contributing 7.9% and wind generation 2.9%. As the fastest growing energy source in the US, President Obama reiterated his support to make renewable energy production on federal lands a top priority. In particular, the President announced a series of executive decisions (i) directing the Department of the Interior to permit enough renewable projects on public lands by 2020 to power more than 6 million homes; (ii) to designate the first-ever hydropower project for priority permitting; and (iii) to set a new goal to install 100 megawatts of renewables on federally assisted housing by 2020. The President will also maintain a commitment to deploy renewables on military installations and will make up to $8 billion in loan guarantees available for a wide array of advanced fossil energy and efficiency projects to support investments in innovative technologies.

· Natural Gas – New drilling technologies such as hydraulic fracturing have significantly increased the amount of recoverable natural gas in the US. These advances are expected to keep the price of natural gas near historically low levels, thus altering energy economics and trends, and opening new opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To better leverage natural gas to reduce GHG emissions, the administration will develop an inter-agency methane strategy to further reduce emissions of this potent GHG.

· Leading by Example – In his first term, President Obama set a goal to reduce federal GHG emissions by 24% by 2020. He also required agencies to enter into at least US $2 billion in performance-based contracts by the end of 2013 to finance energy projects with no upfront costs. In his climate plan, the President established a new goal for the federal government to consume 20% of its electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020 which is more than double its current goal of 7.5%.

· Climate Resilience – The President wants federal agencies to support local investments in climate resilience and convene a task force of state, local, and tribal officials to advise on key actions the federal government can take to help strengthen communities. President Obama also wants to use recovery strategies from Hurricane Sandy to strengthen communities against future extreme weather and other climate impacts and update flood-risk reduction standards for all federally funded projects.

· International Climate Change Leadership – President Obama promised to expand new and existing international initiatives with China, India and other major emitting countries. He also called for an end to US government support for public financing of new coal-fired powers plants overseas, except for the most efficient coal technology available in the world’s poorest countries, or facilities deploying carbon capture and sequestration technologies. A noteworthy initiative introduced by the President was a direction given to his administration to launch negotiations toward global free trade in environmental goods and services, including clean energy technology “to help more countries skip past the dirty phase of development and join a global low-carbon economy”.

Eileen Claussen, President of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, commented that President Obama is laying out a credible and comprehensive strategy to strengthen the US response to climate change. In particular, President Obama’s plan recognizes that the costs of climate change are real and rising; to minimize them, the US must both cut its carbon output and strengthen its climate resilience. These policy initiatives are an important first step, but it will require continued leadership to translate the plan’s good intentions into concrete policy.

Update on China: China Steps into Leadership Role as it takes Action on Climate Change

In his first comments as China’s prime minister, Li Keqiang recently laid out a vision of a more equitable society in which environmental protection trumps unbridled growth and government officials put the people’s welfare before their own financial interests. While the Prime Minister was short on specifics, his comments represent an encouraging acknowledgment of some of the pressing issues facing China.

Traditionally, China has been used as a carbon scapegoat and excuse for inaction by countries such as Canada and the U.S., whose per capita emissions are much higher. However the tables are turning with China beginning to take a leadership role in addressing climate change. China’s emergence as a climate leader means that Canada and other countries can no longer point their fingers at China as an excuse for not taking action to reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions.

China to roll out Cap & Trade in 2013

As the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, China is preparing to gradually roll out cap-and-trade pilot programs in seven major cities and provinces starting in 2013. This initiative is part of a larger goal to reduce carbon intensity – or the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per unit of economic output – by 40% to 45% below 2005 levels by 2020.

In November 2011, the Chinese government decided to implement cap-and-trade pilots in two provinces and five cities (including Shanghai, Beijing and Shenzhen) beginning in 2013 with the final goal of implementing a nationwide exchange program by 2016. In less than two years, officials have designed and started to implement seven trading trials that cover around one-third of China’s gross domestic product and one-fifth of its energy use. If successful, the schemes could demonstrate that an emissions trading system will be an effective way for China to manage its greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, China’s activities may spur policy makers in other countries such as the US to act.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance previously estimated that the regional pilots would cumulatively cover 800 million to 1 billion tonnes of emissions in China by 2015, meaning that the market would become the world’s second largest after the European Union. It has been reported that at the beginning, regional and city-wide markets will remain separate with unique rules and criteria. For example, some of the markets will cover factories and industrial operations exclusively, while others will focus on power generation or non-industrial sectors.

The first trades took place in September 2012 in Guangdong province, when four cement-manufacturing companies invested several million dollars to acquire carbon pollution permits (allowances). The Guangdong scheme is expected to cover more than 800 companies that each emit more than 20,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year across nine industries, including the energy-intensive steel and power sectors. These firms account for more than 40% of the power used in the province. The Guangdong carbon market alone will regulate some 277 million tonnes of CO2 emissions by 2015.

China plans to open six further regional emissions-trading schemes in 2013, in the province of Hubei and in the municipalities of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing and Shenzhen. It plans to expand and link them until they form a nationwide scheme by the end of the decade. A nationwide scheme could then link to international markets.

Until now, China’s experience with carbon trading has been limited to the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol. While China’s political system could let a carbon market grow faster than anywhere else because changes can be implemented quickly, the carbon market faces challenges in China. In particular, China needs to develop and enforce proper legislation and regulations to measure, report and verify carbon emissions from industrial sites. It also needs to build an effective framework to oversee the reporting and trading of carbon credits.

At this stage, the most urgent issue that needs to be addressed is how China collects and analyzes data on carbon emissions. The credibility of China’s statistics on energy use and carbon emissions has been questioned partly because of the large discrepancies between numbers calculated using top-down data and numbers calculated using bottom-up data. Without accurate numbers, the first transaction of the Guangdong trading scheme was based on expected future carbon emissions, rather than historical data. Improved statistical methodology and political action will be required to boost the reliability of carbon emissions data in China. China will also need specific laws to ensure transparent reporting and strong enforcement to prevent fraudulent or misleading claims about carbon emissions.

Chinese Carbon Tax on the Horizon

On the climate front, the Chinese government appears to be on the verge of taking a critical step which has been demonized by politicians in Canada and the USA – that is, implementing a carbon tax. Although the carbon tax is expected to be modest, China plans to also increase coal taxes.

According to Jia Chen, head of the tax policy division of China’s Ministry of Finance (MOF), China will proactively introduce a set of new taxation policies designed to preserve the environment, including a tax on carbon emissions. In an article published on the MOF web site in February 2013, Jia wrote that the government will collect an environmental protection tax instead of pollutant discharge fees, as well as levy a tax on carbon emissions. The local taxation authority will collect the taxes, rather than the environmental protection department. The article did not specify the level of carbon tax or when the new measures will be implemented. In 2010, MOF experts suggested levying a carbon tax in 2012 at 10 yuan per tonne of carbon dioxide, as well as recommended increasing the tax to 50 yuan per tonne by 2020. These prices are far below the 500 yuan (US $80) per tonne that some experts have suggested would be needed to achieve climate stability.

It is not anticipated that China’s plan will have a significant impact on global climate change, although the tax may have some beneficial impact within China itself, where air pollution is a serious problem. A paper from the Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning suggests that a small tax could still raise revenue and provide an incentive to reduce emissions, thus bolstering China’s renewable energy industry.

To conserve natural resources, the government will push forward resource tax reforms by taxing coal based on prices instead of sales volume, as well as raising coal taxes. A resource tax will also be levied on water. In addition, the government is also looking into the possibility of taxing energy intensive products such as batteries, as well as luxury goods such as aircraft which are not used for public transportation.

RGGI Proposes Tightening its Regional CO2 Emissions Cap by 45%

Following a comprehensive two-year program review, the nine Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), the United States’ first market-based regulatory program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, released an updated RGGI Model Rule and Program Review Recommendations Summary in February 2013.

The changes outlined in the Updated Model Rule and Program Review Recommendations Summary are aimed at strengthening the program by making the following improvements:

A reduction of the 2014 regional CO₂ budget (the RGGI cap) from 165 million to 91 million tons – a reduction of 45%. The cap would decline 2.5% each year from 2015 to 2020.
Additional adjustments to the RGGI cap from 2014-2020, which will account for the private bank of allowances held by market participants before the new cap is implemented in 2014. From 2014-2020 compliance with the applicable cap will be achieved by use of “new” auctioned allowances and “old” allowances from the private bank.
Cost containment reserve (CCR) of allowances that creates a fixed additional supply of allowances that are only available for sale if CO₂allowance prices exceed certain price levels ($4 in 2014, $6 in 2015, $8 in 2016, and $10 in 2017, rising by 2.5 percent, to account for inflation, each year thereafter.)
Updates to the RGGI offsets program, including a new forestry protocol.
Requiring regulated entities to acquire and hold allowances equal to at least 50% of their emissions in each of the first 2 years of the 3 year compliance period, in addition to demonstrating full compliance at the end of each 3 year compliance period.
Commitment to identifying and evaluating potential tracking tools for emissions associated with electricity imported into the RGGI region, leading to a workable, practicable, and legal mechanism to address such emissions.

The original RGGI cap was set at 2009 emission levels, with the expectation that emissions would grow. However, emissions have dropped dramatically because of the use of natural gas and other efficiencies in the RGGI states, reducing the demand for the permits. This resulted in depressing the RGGI permit price for carbon credits to under US $2, which is far below the projected US $20-$30. It is anticipated that the lower cap will stimulate interest and raise RGGI permit prices in the next auction. Analyses indicate that the proposed program changes will result in a modest increase in allowance prices, with allowances expected to be priced at approximately US $4 ($2010) per allowance in 2014 and rising to approximately US $10 ($2010) per allowance in 2020. In addition, analysts expect that the proposed program changes will reduce projected 2020 power sector CO₂ pollution more than 45% below 2005 levels.

With the release of the Updated Model Rule, the RGGI states now plan to revise their CO₂ Budget Trading Programs through their individual state-specific statutory and regulatory processes. Each RGGI state seeks to complete their state specific processes such that the proposed changes to the program would take effect on January 1, 2014. A summary of the program review is available online.

California Completes Successful Trial Auction for Cap-and-Trade Program

In advance of the November 2012 launch of California’s carbon trading scheme, the state’s Air Resources Board (ARB) completed in August a successful trial of its carbon allowance auction system, where companies pretended to bid for carbon allowances in order to test out the system ahead of its official launch on November 14, 2012. According to ARB officials, the trial auction ran smoothly, with approximately 150 companies submitting bids during the simulation.

Following the roll out of the platform in November, more than 400 companies will be able to buy and sell carbon credits through quarterly auctions. From 2013, a statewide cap on carbon emissions will be imposed. This cap will be gradually lowered year-on-year, thus providing companies with a financial incentive to curb their greenhouse gas emissions.

Under the planned scheme, companies will need to hold carbon allowances to cover their own emissions and they will be required to purchase additional allowances if they exceed their cap. In the first year of the scheme, the ARB plans to give away the vast majority of credits and auction only 10% in order to put a price on carbon. However, the amount of free carbon allowances will be reduced each year so that by 2020, 50% of allowances will be auctioned, providing a clear price signal for firms to invest in low emission technologies.

Québec introduces 2012-2020 Climate Change Action Plan with 63% of Funds Targeted at Transportation

On June 3, 2012, Québec introduced its 2012-2020 Climate Change Action Plan and the accompanying Government Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation. Under the new action plan and strategy, nearly $2.7 billion will be invested towards the government’s climate change goals. Revenues to implement the plan, which is intended to be self-funded, are expected to come from the carbon market as well as charges on fossil fuels and combustibles which have been extended until 2014.

As the transport industry is estimated to account for 43% of all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Québec, two-thirds of revenues from the action plan will fund transportation measures such as public and alternative transit, as well as inter-modality and energy efficiency in freight transport. The plan also allocates $200 million to support efforts by businesses to reduce GHG emissions through initiatives such as investing in projects related to energy efficiency, process optimization and the installation of environmentally friendly equipment. In addition, $40 million will be dedicated to support the development and marketing of new technologies.

These initiatives constitute the first phase of the 2013-2020 action plan. The second phase of the plan will be launched at the mid-point of the plan and will take into consideration the revenue generated by the carbon market and the new policy directions adopted with respect to sustainable mobility, land use planning and energy. The action plan will also evolve based on new developments in climate science, technologies and Québec’s progress in the attainment of its objectives.

Court gives California Green Light to Proceed with Cap-and-Trade

On September 28, 2011, a California Supreme Court judge ruled that the state’s Air Resources Board (ARB) can proceed with implementation of the California’s cap-and-trade program. The ruling was issued in the case of California Air Resources Board vs. Association of Irritated Residents, in which anti-poverty environmental justice organizations have argued a market-based approach exposes poor and minority communities to higher levels of pollution.
The implementation of the cap-and-trade program, which is scheduled to begin in California in 2012, has been held up because of a March 2011 court ruling that required the ARB to further consider alternatives to cap-and-trade that might provide more effective ways of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. ARB says that it has adequately considered alternatives such as a carbon tax, and is appealing the March 2011 decision in Superior Court. The September 28th ruling allows the ARB to move forward on cap-and-trade before the Superior Court rules.
California’s proposed cap-and-trade program is a major component of AB32, the state’s 2006 landmark climate change legislation. Under the law, California must reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. In addition, the legislation sets an overall limit on emissions from sources responsible for 85% of California’s GHG emissions. The cap-and-trade program is designed to work in collaboration with other complementary policies that expand energy efficiency programs, reduce vehicle emissions, and encourage innovation.
More information on the status of California’s cap-and-trade program is available on the ARB web site.