cap-and-trade program – GHG Accounting

Ontario Introduces Draft Climate Change Legislation and Supporting Cap & Trade Regulation

To facilitate the implementation of its cap and trade program, Ontario has introduced framework climate change legislation and a supporting cap and trade regulation. The Climate Change Mitigation and Low Carbon Economy Act (the Act) legislates Ontario’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions targets, requires the publication of a climate change action plan, and establishes the framework rules for the cap and trade program, as well as the rules for managing the proceeds from the cap and trade program. Ontario has also introduced a draft regulation setting out the details of the cap and trade program, which will cover industries, institutions, electricity generators, and suppliers and distributors of heating fuels that emit 25,000 tonnes of GHG emissions per year or more, as well as suppliers and distributors of transportation fuels that distribute 200 litres of fuel per year or more. The program would also cover entities that import electricity and fuels in to Ontario. Under the cap and trade program, which will come into force on January 1, 2017, 82% of the province’s total GHG emissions will be covered. To create a robust offset credit program in Ontario, a separate offsets regulation will be drafted under the climate change legislation later in 2016.

Overview of the Climate Change Mitigation and Low Carbon Economy Act
The proposed Act looks to:

Make Ontario’s greenhouse gas reduction targets legally binding – the following targets have been established: 15% below 1990 levels by 2020, 37% below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.
Formally direct all cap and trade auction proceeds to a new Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account that would fund green projects to reduce emissions.
Ensure transparency by requiring an annual public report on funds flowing in and out of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account, including a description of funded initiatives and their alignment with climate change action plans.
Provide a legal framework for the cap and trade program.
Provide a framework for reviewing and increasing targets, as well as establishing additional interim targets.
Allow for transitional allowances to large industrial emitters which would be phased out over a period of time.
Require the government to prepare and implement a climate change action plan for achieving these targets, with progress reports and a review of the plan at least every five years.

Overview of Draft Cap and Trade Regulation
In connection with the proposed cap and trade program, the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) has posted a regulatory proposal for a cap and trade regulation, which includes an appendix presenting detailed technical information for the distribution of allowances to eligible capped emitters for the first compliance period, details related to early reduction credits, and an overview of complementary amendments for the reporting regulation and incorporated guideline to support implementation of the cap and trade program.
Ontario is planning to set a cap on emissions for each year of the first compliance period that will start in 2017 and last through 2020; the cap would be set based on the emissions that are forecast for each of those four years. The cap would translate into the total number of emissions allowances that would be made available for covered sectors through auctioning and free-of-charge allocation. Under the program, regulated emitters will be required to hold a sufficient number of allowances to cover their annual emissions.
Between 2017 and 2020, the economy-wide cap is expected to decline at a rate of 4.17% each year to meet Ontario’s 2020 emissions reduction target. The heating and transportation fuel sector and industries will face cap declines. However, the sector-specific cap for the electricity generation sector will remain unchanged from year to year in recognition of the emission reductions that the sector has already undertaken with the closure of coal-fired power plants.
In order to provide transitional support for emissions intensive and trade exposed industries, Ontario plans to allocate emissions allowances free of charge to a broad range of industries including cement, lime and steel. This is aimed at reducing the risk of “carbon leakage”, or the relocation of local industries to other jurisdictions with less stringent environmental standards or no carbon pricing policy. Ontario will review the allocation of allowances at the end of the first compliance period in 2020. The coverage of electricity and fuel imports in the program seek to provide a level playing field for Ontario’s electricity generation and fuels sectors. The government has also indicated that it will consider additional actions to prevent carbon leakage, including border carbon adjustments.
To facilitate compliance, covered sectors would also have the option of funding emissions reductions in non-covered sectors, such as agriculture, through the purchase of offset credits. The government will establish the criteria for creating offset credits that are real, permanent and quantifiable. Furthermore, emitters that have voluntarily taken early and verifiable action to reduce GHG emissions would be rewarded through one-time early reduction credits. Smaller emitters with annual emissions of between 10,000 and 25,000 tonnes would have the choice of opting into the cap-and-trade program and have access to the free allocation of allowances.
The cap and trade proposal has been posted for a 45 day public review and comments may be submitted to MOECC by April 10, 2016.

Revised GHG Reporting Guideline
MOECC has also issued a revised Guideline for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting. To support the proposed cap and trade program, MOECC is now proposing to revoke the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Regulation (O.Reg. 452/09) and replace it with a new greenhouse gas reporting regulation and incorporated Guideline under the Act. Proposed changes will include:

Requirements to report production and other process related information;
Provisions to allow facilities with emissions between 10,000 and 25,000 tonnes to opt-in;
Clarifications on measurement requirements and reporting of biomass types; and
Refinements to the Regulation and Guideline to facilitate implementation of the Cap and Trade Regulation.

BC Restructures GHG Emissions Regulatory Framework in Light of LNG Projects

On October 20, 2014, Environment Minister Mary Polak announced the first part of a restructuring of BC’s GHG emissions regulatory framework with the release of Bill 2, also known as the Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act. This piece of legislation will replace the Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Cap and Trade) Act that came into force on May 29, 2008. The restructuring will continue with the release of the relevant Regulations under the new Act once it is given Royal Assent and comes into force. These regulations will include a new GHG Reporting Regulation and a new Emission Offset Regulation. It is expected that the reporting thresholds in the new GHG Reporting Regulation and the resulting obligations thereunder will remain the same. Tim Lesiuk, Executive Director and Chief Negotiator at Climate Action Secretariat, emphasized in a technical briefing the importance and responsibility of companies assuming to be below the lowest reporting threshold of 10,000 t CO2e annually (called non-reporting entities), to also monitor and document their GHG emissions in order to mitigate the risk of regulatory non-compliance and provide proof of their status as a non-reporting entity in case of an inspection.
A new Emission Offset Regulation is expected to offer an independent offset certification process from the BC Government’s Carbon Neutral purchase program. This will be achieved through a new certification and registry system. The BC Government’s existing Carbon Neutral purchase program conducted by the Climate Investment Branch will continue, but they will source their offsets from the new certification and registry system. Existing offset purchase contracts are expected to be grandfathered into the new system.
The functional new aspect in Bill 2 is the introduction of a new carbon intensity performance requirement. This carbon intensity performance target, called Regulated Operations’ Emission Limits in the Act is an additional requirement beyond the reporting obligation that only applies to industries that are listed in the Schedule of Regulated Operations and Emission Limits in the Act.
The only two listed industries so far are coal-based electricity generation operation with a limit of 0 tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent emissions and liquefied natural gas operations with a limit of 0.16 carbon dioxide equivalent tonnes for each tonne of liquefied natural gas produced. However, additional industries may be added and the BC Government has indicated that it will be announcing climate change measures in other sectors going forward.
The emission target carbon intensity performance quantification is limited to the facility level and therefore does not include any upstream or downstream emissions outside of the facility boundary. In order to meet their obligations, regulated entities with prescribed emission limits will have several compliance mechanisms available to them. In particular, they can:
• improve energy efficiency or increase the use of clean electricity through facility design;
• acquire emissions offsets by investing in BC-based emission reduction projects at market prices; or
• contribute to a technology fund at a rate of $25 per tonne of CO2e.

Besides setting up a new technology fund, Bill 2 also requires the establishment of a registry for the purposes of the Act. This registry will be the only place where offset units and earned credits, resulting from performance below the emissions limit, are tracked. This is also the only place where transactions under the Act can be executed for compliance purposes.
If you have any questions about Bill 2 and the proposed changes to the BC emission offset regime or their potential impacts on your operations or offset project, please contact GHG Accounting Services.

Québec’s First Cap & Trade Permit Auction Results

In the first auction of permits under Québec’s cap-and-trade scheme on December 3, 2013, bidders purchased only about one-third of the emission allowances offered – or 1.03 million of the 2.97 million 2013 permits. As a result of the low demand, the permits cleared at the lowest possible price of $10.75 per metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Québec said it sold a combined CAD $29 million in 2013 and 2016 allowances in the auction. The province plans to sell the remaining 2013 carbon allowances in future auctions, which will be held every quarter starting March 4. Regulated entities will have until November 1, 2015 to acquire carbon allowances covering emissions generated in 2013 and 2014.

Yves-François Blanchet, Québec’s Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment, Wildlife and Parks said that the province is very satisfied with the results of the first auction and is confident that the remaining units will be sold at the upcoming auctions. Bloomberg New Energy Finance market analyst William Nelson observed that it was a “surprisingly under-subscribed auction”, but went on to say that the province’s failure to sell all the allowances in the first auction was a “one-time freak result”. Nelson anticipates that future auctions will fare better as the entities that did not participate in the auction this week will eventually show up as they still need to cover their emissions for the next two years.

Quebec’s program will be integrated with the larger California cap-and-trade market in 2014, when entities from both jurisdictions will be able to buy and sell emission allowances and offsets in either jurisdiction. At California’s last auction on November 19, 2013, the state sold 16.6 million tons of carbon allowances at a price of $11.48 each, which was in line with market expectations.

The results of the Québec auction are available online (in French only)

The results of California’s November 2013 auction are also available from the state’s Air Resources Board.

Release of Latest IPPC Report Spurs Calls for Action from Business Leaders

On September 25, 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis, the first part of its Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Six years in the making, the 2,200 page report was developed by 209 lead authors, citing more than 9,000 scientific publications in their analysis of key physical and scientific aspects of the climate system and climate change.

The report confirms that human influence is the dominant cause of observed warming. Scientists now state with more certainty than ever before, that it is extremely likely (95% probability) that human activities, particularly combustion of fossil fuels and changes in land use, are responsible for the 0.85ºC increase in average global temperatures that has occurred since 1880.

There has been a reduction in the rate of atmospheric temperature increases over the past fifteen years which the IPCC attributes to the absorption by the oceans of a large amount of heat, and sequestering a third of the greenhouse gas emissions. This is by no means good news, since warmer waters expands leading to rising sea levels, sea temperatures also significantly influence climate patterns and an increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in ocean waters contributes to acidification with negative impact on aquatic ecosystems. The report concludes that “human influence has been detected in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes.”

The report lays out four different potential scenarios for global temperature rise over the course of the century, ranging from 0.3 ºC to 4.8ºC. In the immediate decades, all four scenarios follow a similar trajectory, showing a low sensitivity to curbing emissions in the short-term. But if current trends continue, the effects of cumulative emissions will be difficult to mitigate due to the long half-life of greenhouse gases and their continued impact on the climate long after emissions subside.

The AR5 is the first IPCC report to define a “carbon budget” – an estimate of the maximum amount of human caused emissions that can be released in the atmosphere before we experience warming greater than 2ºC – the indicative threshold beyond which extensive global environmental and socio-economic damage is expected. That carbon budget is 1,000 trillion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), of which approximately half has already been emitted. Based on carbon-intensive trajectories, this means that the world has just 30 years until it has used up its carbon budget. If we exceed this budget, the chance of staying within 2ºC of warming looks far less promising.

What does this mean for business? In short, climate change brings with it greater risks and investment challenges:

• More frequent extreme weather events: Higher temperatures and more extreme weather are among the most apparent business risks. At the World Economic Forum in 2013, financial experts named climate change as one of the top three business risks. From raging wildfires to severe flooding, extreme weather events can imperil operations throughout a company’s supply chain. Rising sea levels will also threaten shorelines. According to the IPCC, sea levels have likely risen nearly twice as fast as previously reported. More than 1 billion people worldwide, along with many financial centers, are located in low-lying coastal communities. According to the OECD, average flood losses in major cities around the world could exceed $52 billion per year by 2050, and possibly go as high as $1 trillion without additional protection. At the other end of the spectrum, some regions will be faced with greater water scarcity rather than flooding. In the Carbon Disclosure Project’s 2012 Global Water Report, 53% of respondent companies reported that they have experienced water-related detrimental impacts in the past 5 years (up from 38% in 2011), with costs as high as $200 million for some companies.

• Risks to energy infrastructure: Extreme weather also poses a threat to energy and electricity infrastructure by potentially disrupting production, delivery, and storage of energy. Many power sources depend on water and decreased water availability due to changing precipitation trends may threaten operations.

• Investment risks: Climate-related economic disruption also compounds risks to global investments. A 2011 Mercer study warned that climate change could increase investment-portfolio risk by 10 percent over the next two decades. The IPCC’s carbon budget may have implications for fossil fuel companies, which are traditionally among the higher grossing investments. Since their value is based on proven reserves, there is a risk of devaluation if a significant portion of the reserves are left untapped in order to keep within the carbon budget.

• Insurance risks: Extreme weather events are already having an impact on the insurance industry. As damage from extreme weather events increases, insurers are faced with either hiking rates or refusing to provide coverage in disaster-prone areas. Ultimately, increased costs will be passed onto businesses and consumers.

While climate change presents clear risks to business, smart responses can deliver economic benefits as well. In a 2010 report by the UN Global Compact, more than 86 percent of businesses named responding to climate change as an opportunity. This is reflected in the actions of many multinational corporations, which are already taking steps to reduce risks and lower their greenhouse gas emissions. Whether it is driving emission reductions throughout the supply chain, investing in renewable energy or phasing out the use of carbon intensive materials, companies are choosing to act.

Industry comments in response to the IPCC report highlight the urgent need for action for more, see ‘Experts React’. Nick Robins, head of the Climate Partnership at HSBC, commented that: “The IPCC report provides firmer foundations for policy action. For the world’s capital markets, climate change is an issue of strategic risk management … Our research shows that India, China, Indonesia, South Africa and Brazil are the G-20 nations that are most vulnerable to climate risks. We expect the succession of IPCC reports into 2014 to provide a renewed impetus to policy and business action through to the finalization of negotiations in December 2015.” Head of Swiss Re’s sustainability program in the Americas, Mark Way, also said: “When a body like the IPCC concludes that with 95% certainty mankind is causing climate change we would be foolish not to listen. And yet we are still not listening closely enough. The transition to a low carbon economy and a more climate-resilient society cannot be thought of as options, they are necessities.” Mindy Lubber, president of Ceres (a US-based organisation which presses for greater sustainability and environmental awareness in the business sector) summed it up nicely: “The IPCC report’s conclusion is unequivocal – climate change is happening and it’s disrupting all aspects of the global economy, including supply chains, commodity markets and the entire insurance industry. Business momentum is growing to innovate new strategies and products to manage climate risks and opportunities. But scaling these efforts to levels that will slow warming trends will require stronger carbon-reducing policies globally.”

The IPCC will release three more parts to the AR5 report in 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Mitigation of Climate Change; and a Synthesis Report. For more information on the current report, see IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.

California Governor Gives Green Light to Link Carbon Market to Quebec

In a letter dated April 8, 2013 to the state Air Resources Board (ARB), California Governor Jerry Brown approved a proposal to link the California’s cap-and-trade system with Quebec’s program, paving the way for companies to trade carbon permits across borders.

In the April 8 letter, Governor Brown found that the request from the ARB met all necessary state requirements. The ARB, which has been working with Quebec for several years to develop complementary systems, will consider changes to its cap-and-trade program on April 19 that will allow it to link with Quebec. Quebec is the first region that California has proposed to partner with, which will lay the foundation for a broader system that other governments may join.

ARB staff has said a link with Quebec would expand investments in low-carbon technologies, many of which are being developed in California, and improve market liquidity for carbon allowances by increasing the pool of both permits and companies trading them. According to the Governor’s letter, California will not link systems with Quebec until January 1, 2014. In the meantime, the ARB and Quebec’s Ministry of Environment will test their auction platforms and trading systems to ensure they are compatible. Governor Brown has asked the ARB to file a report with his office by November 1, 2013 outlining how the ARB will review and take public comment on changes to a linked program and whether there are any impediments to linkage occurring on January 1, 2014.

Quebec plans to reduce emissions to 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 with its cap-and-trade program, which applies to about 75 companies in the province. Under California’s program, carbon emissions from power generators, oil refineries and other industrial plants will be capped and then gradually reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. The system will eventually regulate 85 percent of the greenhouse gases released in California.

Regulators in both California and Quebec are issuing carbon allowances through a combination of free allocations and auctions, each permitting the release of 1 metric ton. Companies must turn in allowances to cover their emissions, and those with more allowances than they need, can sell or trade the excess.

Update on China: China Steps into Leadership Role as it takes Action on Climate Change

In his first comments as China’s prime minister, Li Keqiang recently laid out a vision of a more equitable society in which environmental protection trumps unbridled growth and government officials put the people’s welfare before their own financial interests. While the Prime Minister was short on specifics, his comments represent an encouraging acknowledgment of some of the pressing issues facing China.

Traditionally, China has been used as a carbon scapegoat and excuse for inaction by countries such as Canada and the U.S., whose per capita emissions are much higher. However the tables are turning with China beginning to take a leadership role in addressing climate change. China’s emergence as a climate leader means that Canada and other countries can no longer point their fingers at China as an excuse for not taking action to reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions.

China to roll out Cap & Trade in 2013

As the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, China is preparing to gradually roll out cap-and-trade pilot programs in seven major cities and provinces starting in 2013. This initiative is part of a larger goal to reduce carbon intensity – or the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per unit of economic output – by 40% to 45% below 2005 levels by 2020.

In November 2011, the Chinese government decided to implement cap-and-trade pilots in two provinces and five cities (including Shanghai, Beijing and Shenzhen) beginning in 2013 with the final goal of implementing a nationwide exchange program by 2016. In less than two years, officials have designed and started to implement seven trading trials that cover around one-third of China’s gross domestic product and one-fifth of its energy use. If successful, the schemes could demonstrate that an emissions trading system will be an effective way for China to manage its greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, China’s activities may spur policy makers in other countries such as the US to act.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance previously estimated that the regional pilots would cumulatively cover 800 million to 1 billion tonnes of emissions in China by 2015, meaning that the market would become the world’s second largest after the European Union. It has been reported that at the beginning, regional and city-wide markets will remain separate with unique rules and criteria. For example, some of the markets will cover factories and industrial operations exclusively, while others will focus on power generation or non-industrial sectors.

The first trades took place in September 2012 in Guangdong province, when four cement-manufacturing companies invested several million dollars to acquire carbon pollution permits (allowances). The Guangdong scheme is expected to cover more than 800 companies that each emit more than 20,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year across nine industries, including the energy-intensive steel and power sectors. These firms account for more than 40% of the power used in the province. The Guangdong carbon market alone will regulate some 277 million tonnes of CO2 emissions by 2015.

China plans to open six further regional emissions-trading schemes in 2013, in the province of Hubei and in the municipalities of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing and Shenzhen. It plans to expand and link them until they form a nationwide scheme by the end of the decade. A nationwide scheme could then link to international markets.

Until now, China’s experience with carbon trading has been limited to the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol. While China’s political system could let a carbon market grow faster than anywhere else because changes can be implemented quickly, the carbon market faces challenges in China. In particular, China needs to develop and enforce proper legislation and regulations to measure, report and verify carbon emissions from industrial sites. It also needs to build an effective framework to oversee the reporting and trading of carbon credits.

At this stage, the most urgent issue that needs to be addressed is how China collects and analyzes data on carbon emissions. The credibility of China’s statistics on energy use and carbon emissions has been questioned partly because of the large discrepancies between numbers calculated using top-down data and numbers calculated using bottom-up data. Without accurate numbers, the first transaction of the Guangdong trading scheme was based on expected future carbon emissions, rather than historical data. Improved statistical methodology and political action will be required to boost the reliability of carbon emissions data in China. China will also need specific laws to ensure transparent reporting and strong enforcement to prevent fraudulent or misleading claims about carbon emissions.

Chinese Carbon Tax on the Horizon

On the climate front, the Chinese government appears to be on the verge of taking a critical step which has been demonized by politicians in Canada and the USA – that is, implementing a carbon tax. Although the carbon tax is expected to be modest, China plans to also increase coal taxes.

According to Jia Chen, head of the tax policy division of China’s Ministry of Finance (MOF), China will proactively introduce a set of new taxation policies designed to preserve the environment, including a tax on carbon emissions. In an article published on the MOF web site in February 2013, Jia wrote that the government will collect an environmental protection tax instead of pollutant discharge fees, as well as levy a tax on carbon emissions. The local taxation authority will collect the taxes, rather than the environmental protection department. The article did not specify the level of carbon tax or when the new measures will be implemented. In 2010, MOF experts suggested levying a carbon tax in 2012 at 10 yuan per tonne of carbon dioxide, as well as recommended increasing the tax to 50 yuan per tonne by 2020. These prices are far below the 500 yuan (US $80) per tonne that some experts have suggested would be needed to achieve climate stability.

It is not anticipated that China’s plan will have a significant impact on global climate change, although the tax may have some beneficial impact within China itself, where air pollution is a serious problem. A paper from the Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning suggests that a small tax could still raise revenue and provide an incentive to reduce emissions, thus bolstering China’s renewable energy industry.

To conserve natural resources, the government will push forward resource tax reforms by taxing coal based on prices instead of sales volume, as well as raising coal taxes. A resource tax will also be levied on water. In addition, the government is also looking into the possibility of taxing energy intensive products such as batteries, as well as luxury goods such as aircraft which are not used for public transportation.

RGGI Proposes Tightening its Regional CO2 Emissions Cap by 45%

Following a comprehensive two-year program review, the nine Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), the United States’ first market-based regulatory program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, released an updated RGGI Model Rule and Program Review Recommendations Summary in February 2013.

The changes outlined in the Updated Model Rule and Program Review Recommendations Summary are aimed at strengthening the program by making the following improvements:

A reduction of the 2014 regional CO₂ budget (the RGGI cap) from 165 million to 91 million tons – a reduction of 45%. The cap would decline 2.5% each year from 2015 to 2020.
Additional adjustments to the RGGI cap from 2014-2020, which will account for the private bank of allowances held by market participants before the new cap is implemented in 2014. From 2014-2020 compliance with the applicable cap will be achieved by use of “new” auctioned allowances and “old” allowances from the private bank.
Cost containment reserve (CCR) of allowances that creates a fixed additional supply of allowances that are only available for sale if CO₂allowance prices exceed certain price levels ($4 in 2014, $6 in 2015, $8 in 2016, and $10 in 2017, rising by 2.5 percent, to account for inflation, each year thereafter.)
Updates to the RGGI offsets program, including a new forestry protocol.
Requiring regulated entities to acquire and hold allowances equal to at least 50% of their emissions in each of the first 2 years of the 3 year compliance period, in addition to demonstrating full compliance at the end of each 3 year compliance period.
Commitment to identifying and evaluating potential tracking tools for emissions associated with electricity imported into the RGGI region, leading to a workable, practicable, and legal mechanism to address such emissions.

The original RGGI cap was set at 2009 emission levels, with the expectation that emissions would grow. However, emissions have dropped dramatically because of the use of natural gas and other efficiencies in the RGGI states, reducing the demand for the permits. This resulted in depressing the RGGI permit price for carbon credits to under US $2, which is far below the projected US $20-$30. It is anticipated that the lower cap will stimulate interest and raise RGGI permit prices in the next auction. Analyses indicate that the proposed program changes will result in a modest increase in allowance prices, with allowances expected to be priced at approximately US $4 ($2010) per allowance in 2014 and rising to approximately US $10 ($2010) per allowance in 2020. In addition, analysts expect that the proposed program changes will reduce projected 2020 power sector CO₂ pollution more than 45% below 2005 levels.

With the release of the Updated Model Rule, the RGGI states now plan to revise their CO₂ Budget Trading Programs through their individual state-specific statutory and regulatory processes. Each RGGI state seeks to complete their state specific processes such that the proposed changes to the program would take effect on January 1, 2014. A summary of the program review is available online.

California Holds Successful First Auction of Carbon Allowances

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) held its first auction on November 14, 2012 for the purchase and sale of carbon allowances for its planned cap-and-trade regime. Mary Nichols, chairman of CARB, declared the auction a success:

“The auction was a success and an important milestone for California as a leader in the global clean tech market. By putting a price on carbon, we can break our unhealthy dependence on fossil fuels and move at full speed toward a clean energy future. That means new jobs, cleaner water and air – and a working model for other states, and the nation, to use as we gear up to fight climate change and make our economy more competitive and resilient.”

The auction results were released to the public on November 19^th (available online) . A tonne of carbon for the 2013 vintage year sold for $10.09, which is slightly above the $10.00 price floor set by CARB. The highest bid was a whopping $91.13. Also, there was three times the number of bidders at the auction than actual buyers, indicating a healthy and competitive market. Furthermore, 97% of allowances were purchased by regulated entities indicating that prices were not influenced by speculative buyers. Instead, it seems to indicate that regulated entities are looking to retire allowances for compliance purposes. Perhaps most importantly, the auction sold out with all 23,126,110 2013 vintage year allowances being purchased, raising approximately US$233 million. This auction kicks off the largest carbon market in North America and the second largest in the world, behind the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme.

California’s partners in the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) – including British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Québec – are no doubt paying close attention. Apart from Québec, which will launch its emissions trading system on January 1, 2013 with California, the success of California’s cap-and-trade program may spur the other WCI partners into action to implement a similar scheme.

California to hold First Auction of GHG Emission Allowances on November 14, 2012

Bill AB 32 requires California to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The cap and trade regulation (“Regulation”) is a key element of California’s climate plan. The Regulation is designed to provide regulated entities with the flexibility to seek out and implement the lowest cost options to reduce emissions. California’s cap and trade program will be second in size only to the European Union’s Emissions Trading System based on the amount of emissions covered. In addition to driving emission cuts in the ninth largest economy in the world, California’s program will provide critical experience in how an economy-wide cap and- trade system can function in the United States.

It is anticipated that California’s emissions trading system will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from regulated entities by more than 16% between 2013 and 2020. Starting on January 1, 2013, the Regulation will apply to large electric power plants and large industrial plants. In 2015, it will extend to fuel distributors (including distributors of heating and transportation fuels). At that stage, the program will encompass around 360 businesses throughout California and nearly 85% of the state’s total greenhouse gas emissions.

Under a cap and trade system, companies must hold enough emission allowances to cover their emissions, and are free to buy and sell allowances on the open market. As part of the cap and trade program, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) will hold allowance auctions to allow market participants to acquire allowances directly from ARB. ARB will conduct the first auction on November 14, 2012 from 10am to 1pm PST. ARB will also conduct the first quarterly reserve sale on March 8, 2013. Auction participants will have to apply to participate in an auction, or submit a bid for reserve sales, and meet financial regulatory requirements in order to participate in an auction or reserve sale.

The November 14^th auction will mark the beginning of the first greenhouse gas cap and trade program in the United States since the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a cap and trade program for power plants in nine northeastern US states, held its first auction in 2008.

California covered entities, opt-in covered entities, and voluntarily associated entities are eligible to participate in the November 2012 GHG allowance auction. Approved offset registries, verification bodies, and offset verifiers are not eligible to participate in auctions as they are not allowed to hold compliance instruments under the Regulation. Prior to participating in an auction, the Primary Account Representative (PAR) and Alternate Account Representative (AAR) that will be authorized to bid on behalf of entities eligible to participate in the auction must be approved users in the Compliance Instrument Tracking System Service (CITSS) and the entity must have an entity account in the CITSS.

The detailed auction requirements and instructions are available online

California Completes Successful Trial Auction for Cap-and-Trade Program

In advance of the November 2012 launch of California’s carbon trading scheme, the state’s Air Resources Board (ARB) completed in August a successful trial of its carbon allowance auction system, where companies pretended to bid for carbon allowances in order to test out the system ahead of its official launch on November 14, 2012. According to ARB officials, the trial auction ran smoothly, with approximately 150 companies submitting bids during the simulation.

Following the roll out of the platform in November, more than 400 companies will be able to buy and sell carbon credits through quarterly auctions. From 2013, a statewide cap on carbon emissions will be imposed. This cap will be gradually lowered year-on-year, thus providing companies with a financial incentive to curb their greenhouse gas emissions.

Under the planned scheme, companies will need to hold carbon allowances to cover their own emissions and they will be required to purchase additional allowances if they exceed their cap. In the first year of the scheme, the ARB plans to give away the vast majority of credits and auction only 10% in order to put a price on carbon. However, the amount of free carbon allowances will be reduced each year so that by 2020, 50% of allowances will be auctioned, providing a clear price signal for firms to invest in low emission technologies.