Curbing Global Consumption of HFCs

On 15 October 2016, 197 countries struck a landmark deal to reduce the emissions of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), a category of highly potent greenhouse gases (GHG). It is anticipated that this agreement could prevent up to 0.5 degrees Celsius of global warming by the end of this century. The amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer that was endorsed in Kigali is considered to be the single largest contribution the world has made towards keeping the global temperature rise “well below 2 degrees Celsius”, a target agreed at the Paris climate conference in 2015.

HFCs, currently the world’s fastest growing GHG, are commonly used in refrigeration and air conditioning as substitutes for ozone-depleting substances. According to the United Nations, emissions from HFCs are increasing by up to 10% each year as global demand for cooling, particularly in developing countries with a fast-expanding middle class and hot climates, grows rapidly. The Kigali amendment provides that developed countries will start to phase down HFCs by 2019. Developing countries will follow with a freeze of HFC consumption levels in 2024, with some countries freezing consumption in 2028. By the late 2040s, all countries are expected to consume no more than 15-20% of their respective baselines.

Countries also agreed to provide adequate financing for HFCs reduction, the cost of which is estimated at billions of dollars globally. The exact amount of additional funding will be agreed at the next meeting in 2017. While alternatives to HFCs with a smaller impact on the climate are available (such as ammonia or carbon dioxide), they remain more expensive than HFCs.  As a result, grants for research and development of affordable alternatives to HFCs will be the most immediate priority for countries to pursue.

 

Release of Latest IPPC Report Spurs Calls for Action from Business Leaders

 

On September 25, 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis, the first part of its Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Six years in the making, the 2,200 page report was developed by 209 lead authors, citing more than 9,000 scientific publications in their analysis of key physical and scientific aspects of the climate system and climate change.

The report confirms that human influence is the dominant cause of observed warming. Scientists now state with more certainty than ever before, that it is extremely likely (95% probability) that human activities, particularly combustion of fossil fuels and changes in land use, are responsible for the 0.85ºC increase in average global temperatures that has occurred since 1880.

There has been a reduction in the rate of atmospheric temperature increases over the past fifteen years which the IPCC attributes to the absorption by the oceans of a large amount of heat, and sequestering a third of the greenhouse gas emissions. This is by no means good news, since warmer waters expands leading to rising sea levels, sea temperatures also significantly influence climate patterns and an increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in ocean waters contributes to acidification with negative impact on aquatic ecosystems. The report concludes that “human influence has been detected in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes.”

The report lays out four different potential scenarios for global temperature rise over the course of the century, ranging from 0.3 ºC to 4.8ºC. In the immediate decades, all four scenarios follow a similar trajectory, showing a low sensitivity to curbing emissions in the short-term. But if current trends continue, the effects of cumulative emissions will be difficult to mitigate due to the long half-life of greenhouse gases and their continued impact on the climate long after emissions subside.

The AR5 is the first IPCC report to define a “carbon budget” – an estimate of the maximum amount of human caused emissions that can be released in the atmosphere before we experience warming greater than 2ºC – the indicative threshold beyond which extensive global environmental and socio-economic damage is expected. That carbon budget is 1,000 trillion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), of which approximately half has already been emitted. Based on carbon-intensive trajectories, this means that the world has just 30 years until it has used up its carbon budget. If we exceed this budget, the chance of staying within 2ºC of warming looks far less promising.

What does this mean for business? In short, climate change brings with it greater risks and investment challenges:

More frequent extreme weather events: Higher temperatures and more extreme weather are among the most apparent business risks. At the World Economic Forum in 2013, financial experts named climate change as one of the top three business risks. From raging wildfires to severe flooding, extreme weather events can imperil operations throughout a company’s supply chain. Rising sea levels will also threaten shorelines. According to the IPCC, sea levels have likely risen nearly twice as fast as previously reported. More than 1 billion people worldwide, along with many financial centers, are located in low-lying coastal communities. According to the OECD, average flood losses in major cities around the world could exceed $52 billion per year by 2050, and possibly go as high as $1 trillion without additional protection. At the other end of the spectrum, some regions will be faced with greater water scarcity rather than flooding. In the Carbon Disclosure Project’s 2012 Global Water Report, 53% of respondent companies reported that they have experienced water-related detrimental impacts in the past 5 years (up from 38% in 2011), with costs as high as $200 million for some companies.

Risks to energy infrastructure: Extreme weather also poses a threat to energy and electricity infrastructure by potentially disrupting production, delivery, and storage of energy. Many power sources depend on water and decreased water availability due to changing precipitation trends may threaten operations.

Investment risks: Climate-related economic disruption also compounds risks to global investments. A 2011 Mercer study warned that climate change could increase investment-portfolio risk by 10 percent over the next two decades. The IPCC’s carbon budget may have implications for fossil fuel companies, which are traditionally among the higher grossing investments. Since their value is based on proven reserves, there is a risk of devaluation if a significant portion of the reserves are left untapped in order to keep within the carbon budget.

Insurance risks: Extreme weather events are already having an impact on the insurance industry. As damage from extreme weather events increases, insurers are faced with either hiking rates or refusing to provide coverage in disaster-prone areas. Ultimately, increased costs will be passed onto businesses and consumers.

While climate change presents clear risks to business, smart responses can deliver economic benefits as well. In a 2010 report by the UN Global Compact, more than 86 percent of businesses named responding to climate change as an opportunity. This is reflected in the actions of many multinational corporations, which are already taking steps to reduce risks and lower their greenhouse gas emissions. Whether it is driving emission reductions throughout the supply chain, investing in renewable energy or phasing out the use of carbon intensive materials, companies are choosing to act.

Industry comments in response to the IPCC report highlight the urgent need for action for more, see ‘Experts React’. Nick Robins, head of the Climate Partnership at HSBC, commented that: “The IPCC report provides firmer foundations for policy action. For the world’s capital markets, climate change is an issue of strategic risk management … Our research shows that India, China, Indonesia, South Africa and Brazil are the G-20 nations that are most vulnerable to climate risks. We expect the succession of IPCC reports into 2014 to provide a renewed impetus to policy and business action through to the finalization of negotiations in December 2015.” Head of Swiss Re’s sustainability program in the Americas, Mark Way, also said: “When a body like the IPCC concludes that with 95% certainty mankind is causing climate change we would be foolish not to listen. And yet we are still not listening closely enough. The transition to a low carbon economy and a more climate-resilient society cannot be thought of as options, they are necessities.” Mindy Lubber, president of Ceres (a US-based organisation which presses for greater sustainability and environmental awareness in the business sector) summed it up nicely: “The IPCC report’s conclusion is unequivocal – climate change is happening and it’s disrupting all aspects of the global economy, including supply chains, commodity markets and the entire insurance industry. Business momentum is growing to innovate new strategies and products to manage climate risks and opportunities. But scaling these efforts to levels that will slow warming trends will require stronger carbon-reducing policies globally.”

The IPCC will release three more parts to the AR5 report in 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Mitigation of Climate Change; and a Synthesis Report. For more information on the current report, see IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.

 

Durban COP 17 – An Agreement to Agree

 

From November 28 to December 11, 2011, delegates from 194 countries met in Durban, South Africa for the 17th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). With the expiry of the Kyoto Protocol’s initial commitment period looming at the end of 2012, the Durban conference delegates were focused on reaching an agreement to extend or replace the existing UN climate regime.

The negotiators ultimately reached an agreement entitled the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (the Platform is available online). While the absence of specific details as to what is to be agreed by 2015 introduces considerable uncertainty, for the first time a number of nations which contribute significantly to global GHG emissions have agreed to accept legally binding targets on GHG from 2020. This list includes Brazil, China, India and the US.

Four key actions were agreed upon to build towards a global carbon agreement requiring all major emitters to reduce emissions:

  1. Kyoto Protocol Extension. The Kyoto Protocol has been extended for a second commitment period and 35 developed country parties committed to taking on binding emission-reduction commitments after the Kyoto Protocol expires on December 31, 2012. This second commitment period will run from January 1, 2013 to either December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2020, with the final expiration date to be decided upon next year. The parties who committed to a second round of reduction obligations were primarily from the European Union (EU) and have already committed to internally binding emission reduction targets. Certain other industrialized parties, such as Australia, will not take on targets under a second commitment period until a new international climate agreement has been finalized. Japan and Russia have also declared that they will not submit to a second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol.
  2. Global Carbon Agreement.  All UNFCCC parties are required to establish, by 2015, “a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force” that would come into force in 2020. This agreement will replace the Kyoto Protocol and impose binding emissions reductions on both developed and developing nations (including the US, China and India). The goal remains to limit global warming to 2° Celsius. Nations did ot change the emission reduction commitments they made at the 2009 Copenhagen and 2010 Cancun climate talks. Rules will be developed in 2012.
  3. Green Climate Fund (GCF).  It was agreed that up to US$100 billion per annum by 2020 will be transferred to developing nations for mitigation and adaptation measures. However, it still remains to be seen how the parties will finance the GCF, but it is expected that the GCF will leverage private sector capital to source results-based investments in emission reduction projects.
  4. Work Plan. Starting in the first half of 2012, the Durban Platform Working Group will plan its work on matters such as mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer, transparency of action, and support and capacity-building.

Other key outcomes include:

  • Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). CCS was approved to qualify for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and earn carbon credits (under the Kyoto Protocol). 5 per cent of credits issued will be held in a reserve to ensure carbon dioxide does not leak from approved CCS projects for 20 years.
  • Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD). Supportive market-based mechanisms and funding will be discussed through 2012.

As a result of the extension of Kyoto and a second commitment period, emissions offset markets based on the CDM and Joint Implementation (JI) will remain active. Although details have not been finalized, it is likely that the EU will continue to accept certified emission reductions (CERs), which are awarded under the CDM to emission reduction projects in developing countries, and emission reduction units (ERUs), which are awarded under the JI to such projects in certain developed countries. The EU has committed to a third phase of its Emissions Trading System, which contemplates the continued use of international offset credits such as CERs and ERUs.

It is anticipated that carbon markets will continue to play an important role in the new international climate treaty to be established by 2015. According to Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC, the extension of Kyoto will enable its accounting rules, flexibility mechanisms and markets to remain as models to inform future agreements.

Within a day of the negotiations closing, Canada announced that it will formally withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol before the end of the year, with the intent that it will no longer have an enforceable emissions reduction commitment. Canada will, however, remain a party to the UNFCCC and a participant in international climate negotiations.

The next key date is February 28, 2012 when parties must submit their views on raising what the conference called the “level of ambition” to achieve significant mitigation, so that a work plan can be launched. The next round of UNFCCC negotiations will take place in Qatar from November 26 to December 7, 2012.
 

IPCC

 

IPCC is the acronym widely used to refer to “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change“.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is a body established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) for the assessment of climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic consequences.

Website: www.IPCC.ch