Tag: cap-and-trade

California Completes Successful Trial Auction for Cap-and-Trade Program

 

In advance of the November 2012 launch of California’s carbon trading scheme, the state’s Air Resources Board (ARB) completed in August a successful trial of its carbon allowance auction system, where companies pretended to bid for carbon allowances in order to test out the system ahead of its official launch on November 14, 2012.  According to ARB officials, the trial auction ran smoothly, with approximately 150 companies submitting bids during the simulation.

Following the roll out of the platform in November, more than 400 companies will be able to buy and sell carbon credits through quarterly auctions.  From 2013, a statewide cap on carbon emissions will be imposed. This cap will be gradually lowered year-on-year, thus providing companies with a financial incentive to curb their greenhouse gas emissions.

Under the planned scheme, companies will need to hold carbon allowances to cover their own emissions and they will be required to purchase additional allowances if they exceed their cap. In the first year of the scheme, the ARB plans to give away the vast majority of credits and auction only 10% in order to put a price on carbon. However, the amount of free carbon allowances will be reduced each year so that by 2020, 50% of allowances will be auctioned, providing a clear price signal for firms to invest in low emission technologies.



 



	


	





	

		
		
Legal Challenges Unlikely to Delay 2013 Start of California’s Cap-and-Trade Program
	


	
	
	

		
 


According to a panel of legal experts, it is unlikely that recent legal challenges to California’s cap-and-trade program will delay the start of compliance with the system on January 1, 2013. Speaking at the Navigating the American Carbon World conference in San Francisco on April 12, 2012, lawyers said that state regulators have done a good job in designing a system that can withstand legal challenges from regulated industries including the oil, gas and power sectors.


“Even if lawsuits are filed, I don’t think we’re going to see anything between now and the end of 2012 that will actually delay it,” said Tim O’Connor, a lawyer with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF).  He added that: “There might be lawsuits that are continuing, but nothing that will actually derail it at December 31, 2012,” when compliance with the program begins. Other panel members agreed that it was difficult to envision a scenario where a lawsuit would knock the program completely off course.


The majority of the lawsuits filed so far against the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the state agency that designed and is implementing the program, have come from environmental groups, not industry.


A lawsuit by an environmental justice group known as the Association of Irritated Residents (AIR) last year contributed to the ARB’s decision to delay compliance with the program until 2013.


In March 2012, two employees at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), acting as private citizens, filed a lawsuit claiming the ARB overstepped its authority when it said offset credits could count for compliance with the system. State officials and independent legal experts at the conference said they were confident the state would prevail in that case.


One reason lawsuits from industry have yet to materialize may be because the state has designed a system that stands on firm legal ground, EDF’s O’Connor said: “I would hope that the reason we haven’t seen a lot of legal challenges so far is because there are a lot of options that have been taken off the table because of smart design and design that is in compliance with the law”.


(Sources include: Thomson Reuters Point Carbon)


 





	


	





	

		
		
Québec Prepares to Start Emissions Trading as it Formally Adopts Cap-and-Trade Regulation
	


	
	
	

		
 

On December 14, 2011, Québec formally adopted the Regulation respecting the cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emission allowances (the Regulation), which came into force on January 1, 2012 and is based on the rules established by the Western Climate Initiative (WCI).


With the adoption of the Regulation, Québec officially steps to the starting line next to California. The first year of implementation of the system will be a transition year, which will allow emitters and participants to familiarize themselves with how the system works.  In particular, 2012 will provide emitters and participants with opportunities to register with the system, take part in pilot auctions and buy and sell greenhouse gas (GHG) emission allowances in the market. No reduction or capping of GHG emissions will be required during this transition year. Over the course of the year, emitters will also be able to make any adjustments that may be necessary to meet their emission reduction obligations, which will come into force on January 1, 2013.  Starting on January 1, 2013, some 75 operators in Québec (primarily in the industrial and electricity sectors) whose annual GHG emissions equal or exceed the annual threshold of 25,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), will be subject to the capping and reduction of their GHG emissions.


It should be noted that starting in 2015, companies which import or distribute in Québec fuels that are used in the transportation and building sectors (and whose combustion generates an amount of GHGs greater than or equal to 25,000 tonnes of CO2e per year) will also be subject to the capping and reduction of their emissions.


For all participating WCI members, the adoption of a cap-and-trade regulation a cap is the first of two key steps towards the establishment of a regional North American carbon market. The second step will consist of concluding a series of recognition agreements, among the different partners, to link their systems together.


BC and Ontario in the meantime continue to dither on whether to join the cap-and-trade scheme and businesses in those provinces are losing out on key opportunities to participate in the transitional market, recently valued for 2012 at almost US$ 800 million by Thomson Reuters Point Carbon. By finalizing their cap-and-trade regulations in a timely way, BC and Ontario could continue to be leaders in regional efforts to reduce GHG emissions and to spur technological innovation in their provinces.

 

 



	


	





	

		
		
Court gives California Green Light to Proceed with Cap-and-Trade
	


	
	
	

		
 

On September 28, 2011, a California Supreme Court judge ruled that the state’s Air Resources Board (ARB) can proceed with implementation of the California’s cap-and-trade program. The ruling was issued in the case of California Air Resources Board vs. Association of Irritated Residents, in which anti-poverty environmental justice organizations have argued a market-based approach exposes poor and minority communities to higher levels of pollution.

The implementation of the cap-and-trade program, which is scheduled to begin in California in 2012, has been held up because of a March 2011 court ruling that required the ARB to further consider alternatives to cap-and-trade that might provide more effective ways of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. ARB says that it has adequately considered alternatives such as a carbon tax, and is appealing the March 2011 decision in Superior Court. The September 28th ruling allows the ARB to move forward on cap-and-trade before the Superior Court rules.

California’s proposed cap-and-trade program is a major component of AB32, the state’s 2006 landmark climate change legislation. Under the law, California must reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. In addition, the legislation sets an overall limit on emissions from sources responsible for 85% of California’s GHG emissions. The cap-and-trade program is designed to work in collaboration with other complementary policies that expand energy efficiency programs, reduce vehicle emissions, and encourage innovation.

More information on the status of California’s cap-and-trade program is available on the ARB web site.

 



	


	





	

		
		
Study finds that cap-and-trade more likely to trigger clean tech adoption than carbon tax
	


	
	
	

		
 


A study by Professor Yihsu Chen at the University of California Merced has found that a cap-and-trade system is more likely than a carbon tax system to trigger the adoption of clean energy technologies. The study, which was coauthored by Chung-Li Tseng of the University of New South Wales in Australia and that is published in the Energy Journal Volume 32, Number 3, 2011 (a quarterly journal of the International Association for Energy Economics) also found that the volatile pricing of a cap-and-trade system could lead to earlier adoption of clean technology by firms looking to hedge against carbon cost risks.


The study used economic models based on a framework of real options to determine the optimal timing for a coal-burning firm to introduce clean technologies using the two most commonly considered policies: (1) cap-and-trade, in which carbon emissions are capped and low-emission firms can sell excess permits to high-emission firms; and (2) carbon taxes, which employ a fixed monetary penalty for per-unit carbon emissions.


According to Professor Chen, “…cap-and-trade offers ‘carrots’ while taxes offer ‘sticks’. Cap-and-trade induces firms to explore profit opportunities, while taxes simply impose penalties to turn clean technology into a less costly option.”


For the study, researchers considered the scenario of a small firm that owns a coal-fired power plant and is obliged to supply power to its customers. They compared cap-and-trade and carbon tax models in determining when the firm would choose to add a natural gas power plant – a relatively clean energy resource – in order to meet its energy demands while maximizing its long-term profits. The study found that the cap-and-trade model triggered the adoption of clean energy technology at a lower overall carbon price than a tax policy did. Further, the study found that the volatility of non-fixed permit prices was the key difference that led the firm to add a natural gas plant earlier than it would have under a more predictable tax system. Professor Chen said that: “Based on our study, mechanisms designed to reduce cap-and-trade permit prices or suppress price volatility — which have been implemented in existing cap-and-trade programs like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative — are likely to delay clean technology investments.”

 



	


	





	

		
		
California to delay carbon trading program to 2013, but targets remain the same
	


	
	
	

		
On June 29, 2011, chairwoman of California’s Air Resources Board (CARB), Mary Nichols, announced that the state will delay enforcement of California’s cap-and-trade program until 2013. The announcement was made at a hearing on the status of California’s cap-and-trade system, which had been called to explore the implications of a law suit brought by environmental justice groups advocating policies other than cap-and-trade to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In that law suit, a judge ruled in March that CARB had not sufficiently analyzed alternatives to cap-and-trade as required under the state’s Environmental Quality Act. CARB has appealed the decision and an appeals court ruled recently that officials could continue working on cap-and-trade regulations pending the court’s decision.  Ms. Nichols indicated that the law suit was not a deciding factor in her decision to delay the first carbon trading program in the U.S.


The delay in the cap-and-trade program, which was originally scheduled to come into force on January 1, 2012, was proposed because of the need for “all necessary elements to be in place and fully functional”. In particular, Ms. Nichols cited the need to protect the cap-and-trade system from potential market manipulation. The decision came after Ms. Nichols conferred with the state attorney general’s office as well as experts on California’s ill-fated foray into deregulated electricity sales which led to widespread fraud and rolling blackouts in 2000 and 2001. However, Ms. Nichols said that the postponement would not affect the stringency of the program or the amount of greenhouse gas reductions required to be made by industries.  Under the cap-and-trade program, 600 industrial facilities (including cement manufacturers, power plants and oil refineries) would be required to cap their emissions in 2012, with that limit gradually decreasing over eight years. The one-year delay will enable CARB to test the system and carry out simulation models.


Ms. Nichols said that quarterly auctions of emissions allowances that each regulated emitter must turn in would begin in the second half of 2012, rather than February 2012 as originally planned. Entities emitting more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year will begin trading credits at the end of 2012 to cover their emission reduction obligations for 2012 and later. Hence, the first three-year compliance period, which originally covered the years 2012 to 2014, will be shortened to two years. CARB has indicated that it will release draft regulations covering allowance distribution and details on offset protocols within the next two weeks. In addition, CARB has said that it is still on track to finish its cap-and-trade regulations by the end of October 2011.


It is likely that BC and Québec, California’s anticipated carbon trading partners, will follow California’s lead and delay their carbon markets until 2013 as well.


 





	


	





	

		
		
Canadian Provinces Forge Ahead on Cap-and-Trade System
	


				

				
Canada’s three largest provinces – Québec, Ontario and BC – are moving forward with a cap-and-trade system designed under the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 

			

		
	
	

		
Canada’s three largest provinces – Québec, Ontario and BC – are moving forward with a cap-and-trade system designed under the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This decision comes after plans for a cap-and-trade system have been abandoned by the U.S. Senate.


The cap-and-trade system, scheduled to begin trading in January 2012, would cap emissions on large industrial facilities in Ontario, Québec and BC, as well as in California and New Mexico. The five jurisdictions forging ahead are part of the WCI (other group members, such as Utah and Arizona, have not committed to the system). On Tuesday July 27, 2010, the WCI released its comprehensive design strategy (for more information on the design document, please see our overview: link


The WCI’s commitment is to reduce industrial GHG emissions at the regional level from 15% below 2005 levels by 2020.


Each jurisdiction continues to weigh the pros and cons of moving ahead with the WCI system. In BC, any industrial operation emitting more than 25,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas per year will be subject to the system. This threshold will capture 40 operations in the province. While the regulatory framework for a cap-and-trade program has been put in place (under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Cap and Trade) Act and its associated Reporting Regulation), the details of the program as they will apply in BC have not yet been settled.