GHG Reporting – Page 3 – GHG Accounting

Accounting for your Footprint / GHG Inventory

A fundamental key to effectively managing your business risk and cost in an increasingly carbon-constrained world is an understanding of your organization’s carbon footprint, which covers emissions generated by your products and supply chain. In order to calculate your carbon footprint, an analysis of your organization’s GHG inventory is essential. A “carbon footprint” represents a measure of the total amount of GHG emissions that are directly and indirectly caused by an activity, organisation or is accumulated over the lifecycle of a product. The carbon footprint captures activities of individuals, communities, companies, processes, or industry sectors and takes into account all direct and indirect emissions. A carbon footprint can be broken down into two parts, the primary footprint and the secondary footprint.
Click on headline for more info.

What is considered “green” or not has always had, and will always have, different meanings depending on a particular point of view as well as the point in time. At the beginning of the green movement, issues such as forest conservation, protection of wildlife and recycling were the focal points. However this has evolved to encompass more comprehensive strategies which we now understand are required to enable meaningful change. These strategies include more holistic approaches to sustainability, biodiversity and climate change. One of the most interesting things in recent years has been the realisation that these strategies make good business sense and result in positive impacts. Examples of these positive impacts include better yields due to crop diversity, lower energy costs due to energy savings, and lower risks and costs associated with having a smaller carbon footprint.

A fundamental key to effectively managing your business risk and cost in an increasingly carbon-constrained world is an understanding of your organization’s carbon footprint, which covers all greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions generated by all human direct or indirect activities within the boundaries of direct (Scope 1) or indirect control (Scope 2) of your organisation. In order to calculate your carbon footprint, an analysis of your organization’s GHG inventory is essential.

What is a “Carbon Footprint”?

A “carbon footprint” represents a measure of the total amount of GHG emissions that are directly and indirectly caused by an activity, organisation or is accumulated over the lifecycle of a product (Product footprint). The carbon footprint captures activities of individuals, communities, companies, processes, or industry sectors and takes into account all direct and indirect GHG emissions. A carbon footprint can be broken down into two parts, the primary footprint and the secondary footprint.

The primary footprint is the sum of direct GHGemissions and includes activities such as energy consumption and transportation.

The secondary footprint is the sum of indirect GHG emissions from the entire lifecycle of products used by an individual or organization.

Although carbon footprints are reported in tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions, they actually represent a measure of total GHG emissions. GHGs that are regulated include CO₂, nitrous oxide, methane, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride. CO₂ is used as the reference gas against which the other GHGs are measured and the impact of all GHGs is measured in terms of equivalency to the impact of CO₂by way of global warming potentials. For example, methane is a far more potent GHG than CO₂, so one metric tonne of methane is measured as 21 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO₂e.

The accurate calculation of an organization’s carbon footprint is important in ensuring that GHG emissions are not under-counted or double-counted, particularly where emission reductions will be used in carbon trading and carbon off-setting transactions. A careful review of a organization’s methodology for calculating its carbon footprint will play a significant role in reducing the risks inherent in carbon trading and carbon off-setting, as well as ensure the credibility of carbon transactions.

GHG Inventories

A GHG inventory is a breakdown of emissions by activity for an organization, expressed in terms of CO₂e. GHG inventories provide the basis for (i) identifying organizational, geographic, temporal and operational GHG inventory boundaries, (ii) identifying all direct and indirect emissions sources, and (iii) determining appropriate methods to calculate emissions through protocols.

The effective accounting and management of carbon requires unambiguous, verifiable specifications. This will ensure that a tonne of carbon can be consistently calculated. To that end, an internationally agreed upon standard for measuring, reporting and verifying GHG emissions was introduced in 2006 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and is referred to as ISO 14064.

ISO 14064 Standard

ISO 14064 consists of three standards, which provide guidance at the organizational and project levels, as well as for validation and verification:

ISO 14064-1 specifies the requirements for designing and developing GHG inventories.
ISO 14064-2 sets out requirements for quantifying, monitoring and reporting emission reductions and removal enhancements from GHG projects.
ISO 14064-3 sets out guidance for conducting GHG information validation and verification.

What GHG Accounting Can Do For You

GHG Accounting Services Ltd. (GHG Accounting) provides specialized GHG consulting and accounting services, including (i) emissions reporting and footprint inventory quantification, (ii) emissions reduction project planning, and (iii) quantification, documentation and carbon offset credit registration.

WCI issues Second Harmonization Package for GHG Reporting Requirements for Canadian Jurisdictions for Consultation

The Western Climate Initiative (WCI) issued for stakeholder review a second harmonization package for reporting requirements for Canadian jurisdictions.

On October 29, 2010, the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) issued for stakeholder review a second harmonization package for reporting requirements for Canadian jurisdictions that builds upon the previously released Harmonization of Essential Requirements for Mandatory Reporting in Canadian Jurisdictions with the WCI Essential Requirements for Mandatory Reporting and the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (which contains the WCI’s proposal for harmonizing the existing WCI Essential Requirements for Mandatory Reporting for use in Canadian jurisdictions). Comments on the second harmonization package are due by November 24, 2010.

The second harmonization package contains the WCI’s proposal for new quantification methods for five remaining sources: magnesium production, electronics manufacturing, underground coal mining, petroleum and natural gas systems, and natural gas transmission and distribution. The proposed WCI essential requirements are consistent with those of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, but are appropriate for use in the Canadian jurisdictions. It is expected that WCI jurisdictions in Canada will implement the harmonized essential requirements through their reporting regulations.

The second harmonization package is available online link.

BC Releases Consultation Papers for Proposed Cap-and-Trade Regulations

BC Ministry of Environment (MOE) released consultation papers for the Emissions Trading Regulation and the Cap and Trade Offsets Regulation. The proposed regulations will provide the foundation for the province’s proposed cap-and-trade system under the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), which has a planned start date of January 1, 2012.

On October 22, 2010, the BC Ministry of Environment (MOE) released consultation papers for the Emissions Trading Regulation and the Cap and Trade Offsets Regulation. The proposed regulations will provide the foundation for the province’s proposed cap-and-trade system under the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), which has a planned start date of January 1, 2012. MOE is seeking comments from stakeholders, First Nations and the general public on the two proposed regulations until December 6, 2010. The proposed regulations are anticipated to be finalized in early 2011.

The proposed Emissions Trading Regulation is designed to establish an efficient, fair market for trading cap-and-trade compliance units. Under the proposed Emissions Trading Regulation, operations that meet certain criteria will be considered a “Regulated Operation”.

The following provisions are under consideration:

starting January 1, 2012 (or any subsequent year in which an operation emits 25,000 tonnes or more of CO₂e), the regulation will apply to the operator of an operation that emits 25,000 tonnes or more of CO₂e;
source types listed in Schedule A of the current Reporting Regulation (including activities such as general stationary combustion, aluminum production, cement production, coal mining, industrial wastewater processing, lime manufacturing, petroleum refining, and pulp and paper production) are under evaluation to be “covered sources” in the first compliance period;
additional sources types under consideration include emissions from anaerobic or aerobic digestion of wastewater, emissions from surface coal mines and stored coal piles, specific oil and gas and petroleum refinery emissions, and fugitive hydrofluorocarbon emissions from cooling units at electricity generators;
verified emission reports and compliance unit liability may be linked in the registry, meaning that an amount equal to a Regulated Operation’s annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions will become its corresponding compliance obligation;
facilities below the 25,000 tonne threshold may be able to opt in to the emissions trading system;
each compliance period will last three years;
at the end of each three-year compliance period, one compliance unit will be retired for each tonne of GHG emissions;
every three years, BC will prepare a nine-year “Allowance Budget Forecast”, with the first forecast for the period from 2012 to 2020 being published in the first quarter of 2011 (in 2014, BC would release a forecast for the period from 2015 to 2023);
every three years, BC would establish a cap on allowances issued for the following three-year compliance period, known as an “Allowance Budget”;
in the third quarter of 2011 and every year thereafter, BC would publish an annual “Allowance Distribution Plan” that will describe how allowances will be allocated for the following year (including number of allowances to be auctioned, number of allowances to be distributed for free, number of allowances to be held in reserve or contingency accounts, and number of allowances to be sold directly in the market);
there will be two main allowance distribution mechanisms for distributing allowances to a Regulated Operation: by auction and by distribution for free;
auctions of allowances will be held quarterly in coordination with other WCI members on a single round, sealed-bid, uniform price basis;
BC will have the ability to set a minimum price for allowances sold at auction;
allowances allocated for free will be transferred into accounts at the beginning of each year;
a registry will be established to record the issuance, holding, transfer, retirement and cancellation of compliance units;
BC may collaborate on a registry with other WCI members;
compliance will be assessed every three years on July 1 of the year following the last year of the compliance period;
a number of compliance mechanisms will be available to Regulated Operations including limited use of offsets and approved compliance units from other systems, unlimited banking, multi-year compliance period, linking with partner jurisdictions, and government support for low-carbon policies and programs;
BC will set limits on the use of offsets as a percentage of an operator’s compliance obligation and is still seeking input about the percentage to be adopted in BC;
penalty for non-compliance will be assessed at three additional allowances for every allowance that the regulated operation is short; and

The proposed Offsets Regulation will govern emission offsets and set out steps for offset registration, validation, monitoring, quantification, reporting, verification, certification and issuance. It is expected that offsets issued in BC will be able to be traded and used for compliance across the WCI. The following provisions are under consideration:

offset project eligibility will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria: definition of an offset, real, additional, permanent and verifiable;
a BC offset, of “emission reduction unit” (“ERU”), would be issued based on certification of verified emission reductions from a registered offset project (one ERU will represent a reduction or removal of one tonne of CO₂e);
ERUs would be issued for projects located within BC and may also be issued for projects located outside of BC in a partner jurisdiction (Recognized Compliance Units, or RCUs, are compliance units that will be recognized by BC under the Cap and Trade Act but not issued by/in British Columbia.;
ERUs would only be issued for projects that have a start date of January 1, 2007 or later (2007 was the year in which the WCI Memorandum of Understanding was signed);
BC government will carry out periodic risk-based auditing.

The consultation papers for the proposed Cap and Trade Offsets Regulation and Emissions Trading Regulation are available online.

WRI Releases Greenhouse Gas Protocol for U.S. Public Sector

The World Resources Institute (WRI) and LMI have released a protocol entitled the “GHG Protocol for the U.S. Public Sector: Interpreting the Corporate Standard for U.S. Public Sector Organizations”. This protocol outlines how federal, state and local governments can account for their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and serves as a resource for U.S. public sector organizations implementing Executive Order 13514, which requires federal agencies to report and reduce their GHG emissions.

The protocol interprets and applies the GHG accounting principles established by WRI’s “Corporate Standard” to the unique structures of the public sector. The term “public sector” is a broad one that includes any organization owned, controlled or operated by the government and includes government agencies, school systems, quasi-governmental organizations and utilities, as well as public-private partnerships. The protocol aims to help managers of organizations at all government levels design and develop a GHG inventory. For organizations that have already created GHG inventories through voluntary or mandatory programs that are based on the Corporate Standard, the protocol provides useful information on key accounting issues.

The protocol was developed in response to the need of public organizations for tailored guidance on interpreting the Corporate Standard for the public sector. Public sector activities often involve shared resources between multiple organizations and leasing arrangements for buildings, vehicles, and land that can pose challenges attributing ownership or control of GHG emissions. For organizations that already monitor and report energy use and other environmental metrics, GHG emissions reporting represents a new and integrative performance indicator.

As stated by the WRI, the objectives of the protocol are as follows:

• To help public organizations prepare a GHG inventory that represents a true and fair account of their emissions, through the use of standardized approaches.

• To simplify the process and reduce the costs of compiling a GHG inventory.

• To provide public sector organizations with information for use in building an effective strategy to manage and reduce GHG emissions.

• To support voluntary and mandatory GHG reporting.

• To increase consistency and transparency in GHG accounting and reporting among public sector organizations and GHG programs.

While the protocol was developed primarily for U.S. government organizations, the principles contained in the protocol can be applied to governments worldwide since it is based on the internationally accepted Corporate Standard.

LINK

Background on the GHG Protocol Initiative

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative was launched in 1998 with the objective of developing internationally accepted GHG accounting and reporting standards. Designed as a multi-stakeholder partnership of businesses, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and governments, it was convened by the WRI and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD).

The cornerstone document of the GHG Protocol Initiative is the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Corporate Standard, 2004), which provides a step-by-step guide for quantifying and reporting GHG emissions. The Corporate Standard was designed to be program and policy neutral, allowing users the flexibility to adapt the core methodology and concepts to specific accounting and reporting needs. To provide guidance on how to build GHG policies, reporting programs, and tools based on the concepts of the Corporate Standard, two accompanying documents were developed:

• Measuring to Manage: A Guide to Designing GHG Accounting and Reporting Programs (2007); and

• Designing a Customized Greenhouse Gas Calculation Tool (2007).

WCI Proposes Harmonised Reporting Requirements for Canadian WCI Members

On September 8, 2010, the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) released its proposal for revising and harmonising the existing Final Essential Requirements for Mandatory Reporting (the Essential Requirements) for use in Canadian jurisdictions. The proposal is entitled Harmonisation of Essential Requirements for Mandatory Reporting in Canadian Jurisdictions with the WCI Essential Requirements for Mandatory Reporting and the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (the Harmonisation Document).

By way of background, on July 16, 2009, the WCI published the Essential Requirements for implementation by WCI Partner jurisdictions. On September 22, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted its final Mandatory Reporting Rule (the EPA Rule) for greenhouse gas emissions. On May 28, 2010, the WCI invited stakeholder comment on its proposal to harmonise the Essential Requirements with the EPA Rule for use in a cap-and-trade program. In order to maintain consistency across all WCI jurisdictions, WCI members acknowledged that the WCI proposal to harmonise with the EPA Rule necessitated the development of revised Essential Requirements for use in Canadian provinces to ensure harmonised quantification methods throughout the U.S. and Canadian WCI jurisdictions. As a result, WCI members directed the WCI Reporting Committee to develop amended Canadian Essential Requirements that are themselves harmonised with the proposed WCI Essential Requirements for use in U.S. jurisdictions.

The following principles were applied in the harmonisation process:

1. A Canadian facility should apply the same functions, equations, sampling protocols and measurement criteria as U.S. facilities subject to the U.S. version of the harmonised Essential Requirements. This means that the harmonised Essential Requirements will achieve the same level of reporting accuracy for Canadian and U.S. facilities, but the U.S. version may require more data elements to be reported to harmonize with the EPA Rule.

2. The quantification methods included in the harmonised Essential Requirements must remain sufficiently reliable and accurate to be employed in a greenhouse gas (GHG) cap-and-trade program.

3.The WCI reporting system must remain suitable for use in Canadian jurisdictions. For example, it must allow reporting in metric as well as English units and must, where necessary, include Canada-specific emission factors.

4. The harmonised Essential Requirements should facilitate harmonisation with Canadian federal reporting. Some Canadian jurisdictions are working with Environment Canada to develop a one-window reporting tool for provincial and national GHG reporting requirements.

The WCI anticipates that Canadian WCI members will implement the harmonised Essential Requirements by adopting them into or through their reporting regulations. The WCI is also working on minor revisions to the general provisions of the Essential Requirements and the development of quantification methods for upstream oil and gas, natural gas transmission, distribution and storage, underground coal mine and magnesium production that are appropriate for use in Canadian member jurisdictions.

A stakeholder call to discuss the proposal will be hosted by the WCI during the week of September 20th. The Harmonisation Document is available through the WCI web site.

Canadian Provinces Forge Ahead on Cap-and-Trade System

Canada’s three largest provinces – Québec, Ontario and BC – are moving forward with a cap-and-trade system designed under the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This decision comes after plans for a cap-and-trade system have been abandoned by the U.S. Senate.

The cap-and-trade system, scheduled to begin trading in January 2012, would cap emissions on large industrial facilities in Ontario, Québec and BC, as well as in California and New Mexico. The five jurisdictions forging ahead are part of the WCI (other group members, such as Utah and Arizona, have not committed to the system). On Tuesday July 27, 2010, the WCI released its comprehensive design strategy (for more information on the design document, please see our overview: link

The WCI’s commitment is to reduce industrial GHG emissions at the regional level from 15% below 2005 levels by 2020.

Each jurisdiction continues to weigh the pros and cons of moving ahead with the WCI system. In BC, any industrial operation emitting more than 25,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas per year will be subject to the system. This threshold will capture 40 operations in the province. While the regulatory framework for a cap-and-trade program has been put in place (under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Cap and Trade) Act and its associated Reporting Regulation), the details of the program as they will apply in BC have not yet been settled.

WCI Releases Comprehensive Strategy to Address Climate Change and Stimulate Clean Energy Economy

On July 27, 2010, the partner jurisdictions of the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) released a comprehensive strategy designed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, stimulate development of clean energy technologies, create green jobs, increase energy security and protect public health.

The Design for the WCI Regional Program (the Design Document) is the product of two years of work by seven U.S. states and four Canadian provinces (including Québec, Ontario, Manitoba and BC). The objective of the WCI is to reduce regional GHG emissions to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. This regional goal will be achieved by:

• creating a market-based system that caps GHG emissions and uses tradable permits to incent the development of renewable and lower-polluting energy sources;

• encouraging GHG emission reductions in industries not covered by the emissions cap, thus reducing energy costs region-wide; and

• advancing policies that expand energy efficiency programs, reduce vehicle emissions, encourage energy innovation in high-emitting industries, and help individuals transition to new jobs in the clean-energy economy.

A recently updated economic analysis by the WCI indicates that this plan can achieve the regional GHG emissions reduction goal and realize a cost savings of approximately US$100 billion by 2020.

Overview of the Design Document

The primary policy recommendations in the Design Document address some of the following key issues:

WCI Cap-and-Trade Program: The central component of the WCI’s comprehensive strategy is a regional cap-and-trade program that will be composed of WCI member jurisdictions’ cap-and-trade programs implemented through state and provincial regulations. The WCI program design encompasses almost 90% of economy-wide emissions in WCI jurisdictions. Each member jurisdiction implementing a cap-and-trade program will issue “emission allowances” to meet its jurisdiction-specific emissions goal. The total number of available allowances serves as the “cap” on emissions. A regional allowance market is created by the member jurisdictions accepting one another’s allowances for compliance. The allowances can be sold between and among covered entities as well as by third parties. This “trading” of emission allowances keeps costs low because it provides flexibility in how and when reductions are made. For example, entities that reduce their emissions below the number of allowances they hold can sell their excess allowances or “bank” them for later use. Selling excess allowances allows entities to recoup some of their emissions reduction costs, while banking allowances will lessen future compliance costs.

The WCI program design also includes important features to ensure that the program achieves regional emissions in a cost-effective way. For instance, emission offsets from sources not covered by the program can be used in limited quantity along with emission allowances to comply with the program. Allowing entities to turn in allowances in three-year periods provides flexibility as to when emissions reductions are made. To address unforeseen circumstances that could lead to increased program costs, WCI member jurisdictions are considering a number of options including an allowance reserve in the event of high-price conditions, increased flexibility regarding compliance periods, and special purpose mechanisms to address specific local conditions.

Not all WCI member jurisdictions will be implementing the cap-and-trade program when it is scheduled to start trading in January 2012, however those expected to move ahead (including Québec, Ontario, BC, New Mexico and California) comprise approximately two-thirds of total emissions in the WCI. According to the WCI, this represents a critical mass and a robust market for achieving significant GHG emissions reductions.

Between now and the planned program start date of January 2012, WCI member jurisdictions will address remaining program design issues and take the steps necessary to make regional trading operational. In addition, they will expand their efforts to develop and implement other core policies and programs to increase energy efficiency and fuel diversification in order to reduce GHG emissions.

Relying on High-Quality Emissions Data from Rigorous Reporting: The WCI understands that accurate, timely and consistent GHG emissions data is essential for effective GHG reductions. As a result, WCI member jurisdictions have developed a reporting program that specifies quantification methods that are rigorous, technically feasible, cost-effective and sufficiently accurate to support the cap-and-trade program. To minimize the reporting burden in the U.S., reporting requirements have been harmonized with U.S. EPA Mandatory Reporting Rule for GHG emissions.

For further information on the EPA’s GHG reporting requirements, please see Link

This way a facility will be able to submit a single report satisfying both WCI and EPA requirements. WCI member jurisdictions in Canada (including Québec, Ontario and BC) have developed their own reporting requirements, which will likely be set up as a one-window GHG emissions reporting interface with Environment Canada. This one-window reporting would meet the requirements of both the federal and provincial governments, thus eliminating the need for duplicate reporting.

Designing for High Quality Offsets: The proposed WCI cap-and-trade system includes offsets to reduce compliance costs by introducing a broader range of emission reduction opportunities. A particular emphasis has been placed on assuring the quality of offsets. The WCI recommend the following for the definition of an offset and criteria to evaluate an offset project:

• Definition: A GHG offset is a reduction or removal of GHG emissions as a result of a project or activity that occurs outside the sectors regulated by the cap-and-trade program. An offset certificate issued by a WCI Partner jurisdiction represents a reduction or removal of one metric ton of CO2e. To be issued an offset certificate by a WCI Partner jurisdiction, each reduction or removal must meet all recommended offset criteria, have clearly identified ownership, follow an accepted protocol, and result from a project located in Canada, the U.S., or Mexico.

• Criteria: Offset projects approved by WCI Partner jurisdictions will meet the criteria described in the Offset System Essential Elements Final Recommendations (June 2010). The criteria recommended by WCI Partner jurisdictions are consistent with the leading offset systems in use worldwide, and will allow the adoption of protocols that produce consistent offsets across the WCI region. The other North American emissions trading systems – RGGI and the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord – share the goal of ensuring the quality of offsets. The three regional programs released a paper on offset quality (Ensuring Offset Quality: Design and implementation Criteria for a High Quality Offset Program, May 2010) that is consistent with the offset criteria recommended by the WCI Partner jurisdictions.

The Design Document indicates that WCI member jurisdictions will leverage existing protocols to align with the essential criteria and will continue to establish key protocol components for each priority project type. The process of offset project approval through certificate issuance contains important features to ensure offset quality. These processes, which continue to be finalized, will include specific requirements for registration, validation, monitoring, quantification, reporting, verification, certification and issuance of offsets.

Other policy recommendations addressed in the Design Document include:

• setting program emissions limits;

• enhancing compliance flexibility and program adaptability to manage compliance costs;

• maintaining competitiveness and preventing emissions leakage;

• electricity sector;

• designing a fair and transparent auction;

• ensuring a well-functioning market;

• linking programs; and

• coordinating program administration.

To access the complete Design Document, please refer to the WCI Link on this site.

B.C. and Federal Government take first step towards an Equivalency Agreement on Climate Change

On April 6, 2010, the federal Environment Minister, Jim Prentice, and B.C.’s Minister of State for Climate Change, John Yap, signed an Agreement in Principle on efforts to address climate change. This is the first step towards establishing a formal Equivalency Agreement under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999).

Section 10 of CEPA 1999 provides for Equivalency Agreements where provincial or territorial environmental legislation has provisions that are equivalent to provisions in CEPA 1999. The purpose of an Equivalency Agreement is to eliminate the duplication of environmental regulations. Equivalency is based on the following criteria: (i) equivalent regulatory standards; and (ii) similar provisions for citizens to request investigations. This will mean that B.C.-based businesses will not have to deal with competing regulatory requirements, such as for greenhouse gas emissions reporting, when it comes to climate change regulation.

Throughout 2009, the federal government consulted with the provinces and territories on Canada’s climate change strategy. According to Minister Yap: “We are building a strong template for acting on climate change here in B.C. and it is great to have the ongoing support of the federal government as we move forward. Climate change is the challenge of our generation and we need strong partnerships like this one to devise solutions that help us meet our legislative commitments while creating new economic opportunities for British Columbians.”

For more information, please refer to Environment Canada’s news release: Link

Alberta Harmonises its GHG Reporting Program with Federal Program

Alberta has harmonized its GHG reporting program with the federal program

Alberta has harmonised its GHG reporting program with the federal program. Accordingly, the reporting threshold under the Specified Gas Reporting Regulation and the Specified Gas Reporting Standard has been lowered from 100,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) to 50,000 tonnes CO2e. Also, the reporting deadline is now June 1, 2010.

Starting with 2009 emissions data, Alberta facilities will only have to report their GHG emissions once through a single national reporting system to satisfy both provincial and federal reporting requirements. Alberta facilities that exceed the reporting threshold must report their GHG emissions to Alberta Environment via this national system in accordance with the Climate Change and Emissions Management Act, the Specified Gas Reporting Regulation and the Specified Gas Reporting Standard.

Lower Reporting Threshold for Federal June 1, 2010 GHG Reporting

Pursuant to a Canada Gazette notice published on July 11, 2009, the federal government has lowered the reporting threshold from 100,000 tonnes CO2 equivalent (CO2e) to 50,000 tonnes CO2e. In addition, two separate reporting categories for (i) venting and flaring and (ii) waste and wastewater have now been established. These changes will allow Environment Canada to obtain a better understanding of GHG emissions across Canada.

The next reporting deadline for the 2009 GHG emissions data is June 1, 2010. At the national level, all facilities with annual GHG emissions of 50,000 tonnes CO2 equivalent (CO2e) or more must report their GHG emissions to Environment Canada in accordance with the requirements under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. This reporting is completed through the National Mandatory Reporting System for GHGs, operated by Statistics Canada on behalf of Environment Canada.

An important change in the reporting process is the transfer of the GHG data collection from Statistics Canada to Environment Canada, starting March 2010. This change will advance Environment Canada’s plan to harmonize reporting requirements into one system.