Creating or Buying Credits – Financing Your Next Cool Move!

Offset credits are created through the implementation of projects that result in emission reductions or removals beyond what would have been done under normal business activities (the so-called “business as usual” baseline). One credit represents the reduction or avoidance of emissions of one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). Once offset credits are created and certified by accredited third parties, they can be sold to buyers in the market (usually regulated entities that need to meet certain compliance obligations). The system described above is often referred to as a “compliance market”. Offset credits can also be sold in the voluntary market to non-regulated entities who are looking to reduce their carbon footprint voluntarily.
Click on headline for more info.

Climate Change mitigation strategies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can take any number of different forms. The most drastic one would be to simply make the emission of GHGs illegal. This is an extreme example, one that would not be a viable option in an economy based on industrial growth. A more viable options that have been implemented by some, and considered by others, to bring about GHG reductions are market mechanisms. Market mechanisms are designed to utilize market forces to change behaviour, thus leading to reductions in emissions.

Driving Behavioural Change

The most important aspect of market mechanisms is to drive behavioural change – whether by individuals, governments, companies or others – in the direction of low carbon or less emissions-intensive technologies and processes. Offset credits are one of the instruments that have been employed in the carbon market to reduce emissions. However, the market mechanisms that have emerged so far vary quite a bit in their mechanics. As a result, the offset credits generated in these markets will vary accordingly.

How does a carbon market work?

In a so called carbon market (this usually encompasses all greenhouse gases); regulated entities can buy or sell allowances or permits for emissions, or credits for reductions in emissions of specified pollutants. Carbon trading can be done at a regional, national or international level. Under a typical carbon trading regime, regulated emitters will be allocated a limited number of emissions. Emission allowances may be created by a regulating entity, through emissions reduction activities or both. These emission allowances can be auctioned or given away for free. Once initially allocated or created, emission allowances are fully fungible commodities, meaning they can be bought, sold, traded or banked for future use. Often, carbon markets will also allow the use of offset credits as a compliance tool. Allowances effectively set a price on GHG emissions while credits set a cost reward for the investment made to reduce or avoid GHG emissions.

Creating Offset Credits

Offset credits are created through the implementation of projects that result in emission reductions or removals beyond what would have been done under normal business activities (the so-called “business as usual” baseline). One credit represents the reduction or avoidance of emissions of one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). Once offset credits are created and certified by accredited third parties, they can be sold to buyers in the market (usually regulated entities that need to meet certain compliance obligations). The system described above is often referred to as a “compliance market”. Offset credits can also be sold in the voluntary market to non-regulated entities who are looking to reduce their carbon footprint voluntarily.

Opportunities in the Carbon Market

You can purchase credits to offset unavoidable GHG emissions to either meet your own carbon neutral targets or to comply with regulatory emission requirements. You have to make sure the credits you buy are appropriate for the purpose you want to use them for. GHG Accounting can help you make the right decision and evaluate this in the most cost-effective way.

You can also create offset credits. Offset credits can help generate revenue that you can put towards your next efficiency investment. Do you have to replace old machinery, installations or boilers? Or are you changing the way you deal with waste products, energy and emissions?  Even if you have done so recently, your actions may still qualify as an emissions reduction project and can earn you real cash!

Contact us today and we can help you evaluate whether you qualify for this unique financial opportunity.

What GHG Accounting Can Do For You

The effective accounting and management of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions requires unambiguous, verifiable specifications. This will ensure that a tonne of carbon equivalent can be consistently calculated. To that end, an internationally agreed upon standard for measuring, reporting and verifying GHG emissions was introduced in 2006 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and is referred to as ISO 14064. GHG Accounting Services Ltd. provides specialized GHG consulting and accounting services, including (i) emissions reporting and footprint inventory quantification, (ii) emissions reduction project planning, and (iii) quantification, documentation and carbon offset credit registration.

Contact us today to see how GHG Accounting can assist your organization in purchasing or creating offset credits.

Manitoba begins Consultation on Proposed GHG Legislation

The Manitoba government has launched a public consultation period to gather input on proposed cap-and-trade laws aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The consultation is part of Manitoba’s commitment, announced in December 2009, to move forward on enabling legislation to create a cap-and-trade system.

The Manitoba government has launched a public consultation period to gather input on proposed cap-and-trade laws aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The consultation is part of Manitoba’s commitment, announced in December 2009, to move forward on enabling legislation to create a cap-and-trade system.

In June 2007, Manitoba joined the Western Climate Initiative (WCI). It is expected that Manitoba’s system would integrate with the WCI, meaning that Manitoba will be able to participate in the WCI trading system with BC, Ontario, Québec, California as well as other several U.S. states. The WCI’s goal is to reduce GHG emissions in the region by 15% below 2005 levels by 2020.

In 2008, Manitboa’s GHG emissions was 21.9 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) or approximately 3% of Canada’s total GHG emissions. Manitoba’s GHG emissions profile is unique among Canadian jurisdictions. Unlike other Canadian provinces whose GHG emissions come from a small number of large emitters, the majority of Manitoba’s GHG emissions come from many smaller emitters across a wide range of sectors.

Manitoba’s proposed cap-and-trade program would affect approximately 18 emitters  that release more than 25,000 kilotonnes each of GHGs per year. Another group of about 36 emitters that each release 10,000 kilotonnes of CO2e per year or more (but less than 25,000 kiltonnes) would only be required to report their emissions.

According to data from Environment Canada, in 2008 the Koch Fertilizer plant in Brandon was the largest emitter in Manitoba, followed by Manitoba Hydro, Winnipeg’s Brady Road Landfill, TransCanada Pipelines and HudBay Minerals.

Comments on the proposed cap-and-trade program can be made online through the Manitoba Conservation Department website until March 15, 2011.

Saskatchewan to Move Forward with Proposed GHG Program

Saskatchewan is planning to move forward with its proposed greenhouse gas (GHG) management program, with draft offset program methodologies expected to be released in September 2010.

Saskatchewan is planning to move forward with its proposed greenhouse gas (GHG) management program, with draft offset program methodologies expected to be released in September 2010. These draft guidance documents will supplement the previously released Management and Reduction of Greenhouse Gases Regulations which are anticipated to be approved in fall 2010.

Saskatchewan has set a target of reducing GHG emissions to 20% below 2006 levels by 2020. The proposed threshold for regulated emitters is 50,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) per year, and regulated emitters will be required to reduce emissions by 2% per year from 2010 to 2019 to meet the 20% reduction goal. In order to meet compliance obligations, regulated emitters will be able to purchase offset credits created from activities that have reduced and sequestered GHG in Saskatchewan and that occurred after January 1, 2006. In addition, regulated emitters will be able to contribute “carbon compliance payments” to the Saskatchewan Technology Fund Corporation, the proceeds of which will be used to invest in GHG reduction initiatives and research.

The proposed Saskatchewan GHG management program is similar to the one currently operating in Alberta, where the emissions threshold for regulation is also 50,000 tonnes of CO2e. Alberta and Saskatchewan are considering linking their GHG programs in order to increase the liquidity of the markets.

GWP

 

GWP is the acronym widely used to refer to “Global Warming Potential“.

The Global Warming Potential of a greenhouse gas indicates to what extent functionally, in regards to their green house gas effect on a 100 year time line, it is functionally equivalent to a certain amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

In colloquial terms, it describes the heat trapping ability of a greenhouse gas in the atmospheric cover of a planet. And it does that in relation to the heat trapping ability of CO2 by assigning a factor. The global warming potential, for example, of CO2 is 1 and the global warming potential of methane is 21. So methane has a 21 times higher heat trapping ability than CO2 on a 100 year time line/ time horizon.

For the purpose of GHG accounting, the global warming potential of a certain greenhouse gas provides the conversion factor to convert a specific amount of greenhouse gas emissions into CO2e (CO2 equivalent) emissions.

Global warming potentials for greenhouse gases

(Source: Environment Canada)

IPCC Global Warming Potentials – 100-Year Time Horizon
Greenhouse Gas

Formula

Second Assessment Report

Fourth Assessment Report

Carbon dioxide CO2 1 1
Methane CH4 21 25
Nitrous oxide N2O 310 298
Sulphur hexafluoride SF6 23 900 22 800
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
HFC-23 CHF3 11 700 14 800
HFC-32 CH2F2 650 675
HFC-41 CH3F 150
HFC-43-10mee C5H2F10 1 300 1 640
HFC-125 C2HF5 2 800 3 500
HFC-134 C2H2F4
(Structure: CHF2CHF2)
1 000
HFC-134a C2H2F4
(Structure: CH2FCF3)
1 300 1 430
HFC-143 C2H3F3
(Structure: CHF2CH2F)
300
HFC-143a C2H3F3
(Structure: CF3CH3)
3 800 4 470
HFC-152a C2H4F2
(Structure: CH3CHF2)
140 124
HFC-227ea C3HF7 2 900 3 220
HFC-236fa C3H2F6 6 300 9 810
HFC-245ca C3H3F5 560
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
Perfluoromethane CF4 6 500 7 390
Perfluoroethane C2F6 9 200 12 200
Perfluoropropane C3F8 7 000
Perfluorobutane C4F10 7 000 8 860
Perfluorocyclobutane c-C4F8 8 700
Perfluoropentane C5F12 7 500
Perfluorohexane C6F14 7 400 9 300

1 IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996)
2 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007)